Skip to content

RippleGen is a lot less efficient than it should be #3

Description

@stevenroose

I don't know exactly what the 50% estimate means, but on my system, it takes RippleGen usually 20x the estimated time to find a matching address.

I've been searching for a 4-letter pattern (excluding the leading r) for hours on end without success while the 50% estimate is 39 minutes.

When I started experimenting a little with other patterns, all of them were around 20x slower than estimated.

I run the latest Ubuntu Linux, 64-bit. Any idea how this comes, or is it supposed to be like this?

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions