Skip to content

License of the type defintions #60

Description

@dhuber66

Hi,

in your license text you state: "Copyrights are respective of each contributor listed at the beginning of each definition".
This is a huge problem as the default license for everything publicly posted is: "You have no license to use this". Not defining a contribution policy is prohibiting a legally safe use of any of the defintions.
If you want to include the defintions in any project you would be required to ask each contributor who has not put a license in his defintions for agreement.
I would suggest that you put an implicit CLA (contributors license agreement) onto this page and make clear that each post without license will be published under this license.

Cheers

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions