What should happen after an AI code reviewer suggests a fix?

[ISabiTech16]

AI code review tools can identify potential issues and generate patches. But applying a patch is only one part of the workflow.

The important question is: Did the change actually improve the code without introducing another problem?

In CodeGuard AI, the developer explicitly approves the suggested fix. The system then performs a fresh review and can run optional Docker-based test validation.

I'm interested in hearing from Java and Spring Boot developers:

1. Do you currently validate AI-suggested fixes automatically?
2. Would you trust a PR review more if it included a fresh validation result?
3. What would you expect from a self-hosted AI code reviewer before using it on a private repository?

Here's a short demonstration of the workflow:

codeguard-ai-demo.mp4