The OM Standard defines a couple of technical terms (e.g. bound and free, that set me off). and we currently use <quote>foo</quote> to mark up the definienda. It would be helpful to the reader, if we would have markup and interlinking for defined terms. I.e.
a <termdef id="foo">formal object ontology</termdef>, i.e a ....
and then later
we use the <termref href="foo">formal object ontology</termref> for
The idea is that <termdef> becomes bold in the html and PDF and carries and anchor and the <termref> becomes a link to that "defining occurrence".
That would be relatively easy to implement in the conversion and I would be willing to add the markup.
cc: @JamesHDavenport @pdfion
The OM Standard defines a couple of technical terms (e.g. bound and free, that set me off). and we currently use
<quote>foo</quote>to mark up the definienda. It would be helpful to the reader, if we would have markup and interlinking for defined terms. I.e.and then later
The idea is that
<termdef>becomes bold in the html and PDF and carries and anchor and the<termref>becomes a link to that "defining occurrence".That would be relatively easy to implement in the conversion and I would be willing to add the markup.
cc: @JamesHDavenport @pdfion