You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Commit aa39279
Browse filesBrowse the repository at this point in the historyBrowse files
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: projects/ep_toy_gaussian.md
+4-4Lines changed: 4 additions & 4 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -5,16 +5,16 @@ Issue: ep_toy_gaussian#1
5
5
6
6
## Now
7
7
8
-
n50_seed42 is on RAL: NUTS + one-by-one as 342639, EP x3 on identical data as 342640_[0-2]. The one-by-one leg finished (50/50 in 319 s); the EP repeats are turning per-factor Dynesty fits.
9
-
Next: pull and run scripts/compare.py --sample n50_seed42; settle first whether a prior factor with only NO_CHANGE rows counts as zero SUCCESS updates.
8
+
Wave 1 (n50_seed42: 342639 + 342640_[0-2]) failed on infrastructure — NUTS OOM at the 8 GB cap, EP x3 EMFILE (fixed upstream by PyAutoFit#1632/#1634, RAL mirror now a73684012). The collapse question at N=50 is unanswered. Only n5_smoke speaks so far: EP RECOVER 3/3 (parent sigma 10.14/9.96/9.83 vs truth 10, no collapse, no BIASED-TIGHT), NUTS 49.89/11.14. Next: wave 2 needs a human go, a NEW sample name (e.g. n50_seed42_w2 — never re-run into an existing sample directory) and the NUTS SBATCH memory raised above 8 GB.
- 342640 — open — ral — 2026-09-10 — nuts_vs_ep_x3_n50: EP x3 on identical data, array 0-2
15
12
16
13
## Log
17
14
15
+
- 2026-09-24 — note — per-search overhead profile on this toy (2026-09-24, laptop, N=5, max_steps=3): 2.45 s per Dynesty factor search, ~1.47 s dynesty run_nested + ~0.98 s autofit wrapper (plots, a redundant second run_nested pass, samples writes); inside run_nested instance_from_vector is 57 % of the likelihood callback for a 1-parameter model. Speed-up prompt filed in the Mind: draft/refactor/autofit/ep_factor_search_wrapper_overhead.md
16
+
- 2026-09-24 — run — 342640 failed — wall 0:14: nuts_vs_ep_x3_n50: EP x3 on identical data, array 0-2 — all three array tasks [0-2] CRASH OSError [Errno 24] Too many open files after ~126 Dynesty factor fits each (wall ~860-880 s), no ep_history.csv; results/n50_seed42/comparison.md scores WITNESS NOT MET 0/7 on infrastructure, not science. Cause: RAL mirror PyAutoFit e354dbb6b built a Pool(1) per single-core Dynesty fit (~+8 fds per fit vs 1024 soft ulimit); fixed by PyAutoFit#1632 (merged 2026-09-15) + #1634 (merged 2026-09-17); RAL mirror now a73684012 (2026-09-19) contains both; local check 2026-09-24 on a73684012: fd count flat at 7 across 15 EP factor searches (N=5, max_steps=3)
17
+
- 2026-09-24 — run — 342639 failed: nuts_vs_ep_x3_n50: one_by_one + BlackJAX NUTS, partition ral — one_by_one completed 50/50 in 319 s (naive parent 52.470 ± 1.260, deconvolved scatter 3.142); NUTS leg OUT_OF_MEMORY at the 8 GB SBATCH cap during window adaptation, no nuts.json
18
18
- 2026-09-10 — run — 342640 submitted: nuts_vs_ep_x3_n50 — EP x3 on identical data, array 0-2
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: projects/slope_hierarchy_scale.md
+3-2Lines changed: 3 additions & 2 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -5,17 +5,18 @@ Issue: slope_hierarchy_scale#2
5
5
6
6
## Now
7
7
8
-
N=25 scale-up: graphical array 342348_[0-24] and joint fit 342350_0 still open; EP witness rerun 343299 (MAX_STEPS=2, --use_cpu on the decoupled script from slope_hierarchy_scale#4) submitted 2026-09-15 after 342410 died at ~EP step 3 on LLVM compile memory. Next: pull 343299 and confirm the first factor_step ran JAX-vectorised with no pool; the full EP arm waits on the PyAutoFit compile-memory fix (draft/bug/autofit/ep_re_jit_compiles_the_vmapped_likelihood.md).
8
+
343299 (EP witness rerun, MAX_STEPS=2) completed: dataset factors all SUCCESS and JAX-vectorised with one compile per factor search, but the hierarchical factor never updated (0/50 SUCCESS: 27 BAD_PROJECTION + 23 FAILURE), so the parent came back as the prior. The EP arm cannot estimate the slope scatter with the Laplace projection; the moment-matching cure (draft/feature/autofit/ep_hierarchical_scatter_moment_matching.md) is the gate — human decision. Still open: graphical array 342348_[0-24], joint fit 342350_0, EP arm 342351_0.
9
9
10
10
## Runs
11
11
12
12
- 342348_[0-24] — open — gpu — 2026-09-08 — n25_scale_up: one lens per array task, hpc/batch_gpu/submit_one_by_one, sample_n25_seed42
- 342351_0 — open — ral — 2026-09-08 — n25_scale_up: EP arm on the CPU partition, hpc/batch_cpu/submit_ep, max_steps 12; RAL PyAutoFit mirror 68ff9bd57 predates PyAutoFit#1580, so this arm runs without the stale-mask fixed-point fix
15
-
- 343299 — open — ral — 2026-09-15 — n25_scale_up: EP witness rerun on the decoupled --use_cpu script (slope_hierarchy_scale#4), JAX vectorised likelihood on the CPU backend, no pool, MAX_STEPS=2 via sbatch --export; stale 342410 output parked as ep_dead_342410
16
15
17
16
## Log
18
17
18
+
- 2026-09-24 — note — 343299 finding: BAD_PROJECTION = Hessian at the mode not finite or not negative-definite (scale parameter driven to a limit); FAILURE = line search failed and the mean field was handed back unchanged. This is the Laplace-on-scatter caveat (autofit/graphical/README.md §3.5, analytic_gaussian leg B) at 100 % on the lensing model: per-lens slope widths 0.002-0.05 are far tighter than the scatter prior, so the tilted density in sigma sits at the boundary.
19
+
- 2026-09-24 — run — 343299 finished — wall 5:20: n25_scale_up: EP witness rerun on the decoupled --use_cpu script (slope_hierarchy_scale#4), JAX vectorised likelihood on the CPU backend, no pool, MAX_STEPS=2 via sbatch --export; stale 342410 output parked as ep_dead_342410 — COMPLETED 2026-09-16 02:03 BST, MAX_STEPS=2, 25 lenses, JAX-on-CPU, no pool: 50 'jit compiling vectorized' lines = one compile per factor search (2 steps x 25), confirming draft/refactor/autofit/ep_analysis_level_compile_cache.md. Every dataset factor SUCCESS (2/2 each) BUT the hierarchical factor is fully STALE: HierarchicalFactor0 50 rows = 27 BAD_PROJECTION + 23 FAILURE, zero SUCCESS (PriorFactor239 and PriorFactor263 also stale); library STALE FACTORS warning fired. Parent recovery printed exactly the prior: mean 2.0000 ± 0.7071, sigma 0.5000 ± 0.3536 (prior TG(2,1) / TG(0.5,0.5); truth sigma 0.1). EP output local at output/sample_n25_seed42/ep/expectation_propagation/a7ec60f07f4261afcb98b2adef484199/ (ep_history.csv, ep_diagnostics.results)
19
20
- 2026-09-15 — run — 343299 submitted: n25_scale_up: EP witness rerun on the decoupled --use_cpu script (slope_hierarchy_scale#4), JAX vectorised likelihood on the CPU backend, no pool, MAX_STEPS=2 via sbatch --export; stale 342410 output parked as ep_dead_342410
20
21
- 2026-09-15 — run — 342410 failed — wall 11:05: n25_scale_up: EP arm rerun on the JAX-on-CPU path (no multiprocessing pool); replaces 342351_0 — JAX-on-CPU path, no pool: 76 factor searches (~3 EP steps of 25) then LLVM JIT section memory exhausted 64 GB; aborted 2026-09-10 09:29 (slope_hierarchy_scale#3 phase; compile-memory bug filed against PyAutoFit)
21
22
- 2026-09-09 — run — 342410 submitted: n25_scale_up — EP arm rerun on the JAX-on-CPU path (no multiprocessing pool); replaces 342351_0
0 commit comments