From fc986797add3193cf4156431b85d7e9e53b1f546 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jammy2211 Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2026 07:51:11 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] docs: expand dashboard check-in prompts --- scripts/board.py | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/board.py b/scripts/board.py index 9773504..4be0226 100644 --- a/scripts/board.py +++ b/scripts/board.py @@ -754,14 +754,33 @@ def _repo_url(snapshot: dict) -> str: CHECKIN_PROMPT = ( - "Review the Memory knowledge board in this chat. Read PyAutoMemory/AGENTS.md, " - "its index and relevant domain indexes; then inspect the reading queue, digest " - "freshness, unresolved canonical keys and stub work. Read at most two or three " - "relevant pages after each index. Summarize priorities and propose one bounded " - "next step, retaining missing evidence as unknown. Apply my direction while " - "keeping the queue in view. Follow existing catch-up selection approval and " - "development workflow for writes; do not bulk-ingest papers, commit source " - "PDFs or post issues automatically." + "Use this chat as an ongoing place to work with PyAutoMemory: retrieve existing " + "knowledge, discuss papers and improve the knowledge base. Read PyAutoMemory/AGENTS.md, " + "its index and the relevant domain indexes. Start with a small selection of relevant " + "pages and expand as the question requires.\n\n" + "When I give no particular direction, review the reading queue, arXiv inbox and " + "interests, digest freshness, citation work, incomplete pages and filings awaiting merge. " + "Summarize what needs attention and suggest useful next steps, distinguishing new " + "material from work already processed.\n\n" + "When I supply a paper, topic, question or idea, make that the main focus. Help me find " + "prior knowledge, recall recorded decisions, understand a paper, compare methods or " + "identify gaps in existing coverage. Bring in related material where useful; do not " + "repeat the full queue review on every follow-up.\n\n" + "Ground answers in cited sources. Distinguish what a paper establishes, what our existing " + "notes say and any interpretation you offer. Make uncertainty and conflicting evidence " + "explicit. Discuss connections to our work without treating a published claim as " + "something we have independently verified.\n\n" + "Help me select what to read, work through a paper in depth, develop notes or plan " + "improvements to wiki pages and citations. Follow the existing reading, catch-up and " + "filing procedures. Agree the selection before bulk processing, and avoid duplicating " + "existing entries.\n\n" + "When I ask you to preserve knowledge, update the appropriate canonical pages, " + "bibliography or queue records through the repository’s workflow. Keep source attribution " + "and distinguish proposed ideas from accepted project decisions. Do not commit source " + "PDFs.\n\n" + "Carry clearly authorized work through its workflow, retaining approvals already given in " + "this conversation. After changes, report what was recorded, where it lives and what " + "remains to read or resolve." )