Onboarding Request- Checkmarx MCP Server Published But Not Visible on github.com/mcp Registry #3084
Replies: 1 comment
|
The tenant-specific URL may be the reason this entry needs additional handling. For remote servers, the official MCP Registry supports URL template variables using I would publish the remote configuration in {
"remotes": [
{
"type": "streamable-http",
"url": "{cxone_base_url}/api/security-mcp/mcp/{tenant_id}",
"variables": {
"cxone_base_url": {
"description": "Checkmarx tenant base URL, including https://",
"isRequired": true
},
"tenant_id": {
"description": "Checkmarx tenant identifier",
"isRequired": true
}
}
}
]
}OAuth discovery can then happen after the client resolves the customer-specific endpoint. If the published Registry entry already uses this structure and is active, the remaining issue is likely GitHub’s asynchronous ingestion or its support for templated remote URLs. The GitHub team would need to confirm whether Official remote-server publishing specification: https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/modelcontextprotocol/blob/main/docs/registry/remote-servers.mdx |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hi Team,
I hope you are doing well!
We have successfully published our Checkmarx MCP to public official MCP registry.
Refer the link: https://registry.modelcontextprotocol.io/?q=Checkmarx
We would like to request include our MCP into the GitHub MCP registry (https://github.com/mcp). Please find the request (150713).
The Checkmarx MCP endpoint is now tenant-specific and must be dynamically constructed using customer-provided values.
The following parameters are required during configuration:
CXONE_BASE_URL – Checkmarx tenant base URL
TENANT_ID – Checkmarx tenant identifier
We would like OAuth 2.0 to be presented as the default and recommended authentication method for customers configuring the Checkmarx MCP integration.
Our preferred MCP configuration is shown below:
We would be happy to provide any additional technical details, participate in validation testing, or collaborate with your team to identify the most appropriate solution.
Thank you for your time and assistance. We look forward to your guidance.
@trent-j
Best Regards,
Anand Nandeshwar
All reactions