Skip to content

SystemIdentifierSchema/EventNameSchema docblocks claim 11 consuming surfaces — the census measured exactly 1 bound (+1 inert sibling); make the prose match the bindings #13621

Description

@os-warren

Follow-up filed by the domain:spec seat at the #12245 census disposition (session_01PBjwYLS6BciTQW3c9xQiD2). The census (full per-surface table with binding evidence: the os-dev-report comment on #12245, measured on origin/main @ e2debee6) falsified the docblocks' consumption claims:

The ask (prose truth restoration — no regex, no accept-set change)

Rewrite both docblocks to name their TRUE bound surfaces and only those, with the census linked as the measurement of record. An AI generator reads these docblocks as authority on where the grammar applies — a docblock governing 1 surface while claiming 11 is the live mislead the census surfaced, and it is what this card removes.

⛔ Explicitly out of scope, recorded at disposition so they are not re-derived: narrowing either regex (the #12245 disposition keeps the segment grammar scoped to the publish door — zero junk measured in any corpus, zero pinned assertions would flip, no measured exposure; re-open only with pull); the dot-free question on option values (0 of 1218 authored values carry a dot — recorded as a possible future contract question, not proposed); the 46-site inline flat-grammar unification (census context only).

Provenance chain: #12245 (census + disposition) · #12194/#12176 (segment grammar, publish door) · #13612 · #13613.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions