From a49d5034a290994c0002f3c9849906bea33fb3c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Neese <86121077+neeseoncloud9@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 18:38:12 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] going back to a reproducable hash since it was changed in 2020 commit 03aa37e also Python upgrades make zip MD5s even less stable So: b9b90449 is possible (hash the files, not the zip). f4acd55a is not a stable target --- lambda_hook/tests/test_lambda.py | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lambda_hook/tests/test_lambda.py b/lambda_hook/tests/test_lambda.py index 5645076..13336e6 100644 --- a/lambda_hook/tests/test_lambda.py +++ b/lambda_hook/tests/test_lambda.py @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ def test_upload_lambda_functions(self): # 2nd call should recognize the file has already been uploaded and should not call put_object again self.stubber.add_response("head_bucket", {}) - self.stubber.add_response("head_object", { "ETag": '"f4acd55a9e25a6c7a789ddbe52bc7521"' }) + self.stubber.add_response("head_object", { "ETag": '"b9b90449fe17ded2c9424367f0fd147e"' }) with self.stubber: aws_lambda.upload_lambda_functions(self.s3, BUCKET_NAME, "things", tmp_dir.path) self.stubber.assert_no_pending_responses()