@@ -47,6 +47,78 @@ fn given_repeated_native_evaluation_when_faulting_then_returns_deterministic_com
     Ok(())
 }
 
+#[test]
+fn given_enforced_contract_when_column_type_is_missing_then_typed_contract_rule_faults()
+-> Result<(), String> {
+    let test_cases = [
+        test_types::TypedContractColumnTestCase {
+            description: "enforced contract has one untyped column",
+            contract: "enforced",
+            columns: json!([
+                {"name": "order_id", "type": "INTEGER", "type_proven": true},
+                {"name": "status", "type": "", "type_proven": false}
+            ]),
+            expected_fault_count: 1,
+            expected_messages: &["contract column \"status\" has no declared type"],
+        },
+        test_types::TypedContractColumnTestCase {
+            description: "enforced contract has only typed columns",
+            contract: "enforced",
+            columns: json!([
+                {"name": "order_id", "type": "INTEGER", "type_proven": true}
+            ]),
+            expected_fault_count: 0,
+            expected_messages: &[],
+        },
+        test_types::TypedContractColumnTestCase {
+            description: "unenforced column metadata remains outside this rule",
+            contract: "none",
+            columns: json!([
+                {"name": "status", "type": "", "type_proven": false}
+            ]),
+            expected_fault_count: 0,
+            expected_messages: &[],
+        },
+    ];
+
+    for test_case in test_cases {
+        let project_dir = TempDir::new().map_err(|error| error.to_string())?;
+        let mut request: Value = serde_json::from_str(&helpers::request(
+            &project_dir,
+            &json!({
+                "select": ["SQBRCONTRACT106"],
+                "cache": {"enabled": false}
+            }),
+        ))
+        .map_err(|error| error.to_string())?;
+        request["models"][0]["config"] = json!({"contract": test_case.contract});
+        request["models"][0]["columns"] = test_case.columns;
+
+        let result: Value = serde_json::from_str(&evaluate_json(&request.to_string())?)
+            .map_err(|error| error.to_string())?;
+        let faults = result["faults"]
+            .as_array()
+            .ok_or_else(|| "faults must be an array".to_string())?;
+        let messages = faults
+            .iter()
+            .filter_map(|fault| fault["message"].as_str())
+            .collect::<Vec<_>>();
+
+        assert_eq!(
+            faults.len(),
+            test_case.expected_fault_count,
+            "{}",
+            test_case.description
+        );
+        assert_eq!(
+            messages, test_case.expected_messages,
+            "{}",
+            test_case.description
+        );
+    }
+    Ok(())
+}
+
 #[test]
 fn given_scoped_suppression_when_evaluating_native_fault_then_returns_no_faults()
 -> Result<(), String> {
 
@@ -29,6 +29,14 @@ pub(crate) struct ExplicitOutputTypeTestCase {
     pub(crate) expected_message_fragment: &'static str,
 }
 
+pub(crate) struct TypedContractColumnTestCase {
+    pub(crate) description: &'static str,
+    pub(crate) contract: &'static str,
+    pub(crate) columns: Value,
+    pub(crate) expected_fault_count: usize,
+    pub(crate) expected_messages: &'static [&'static str],
+}
+
 pub(crate) struct NormalizationTestCase {
     pub(crate) description: &'static str,
     pub(crate) dialect: &'static str,
 
@@ -173,6 +173,13 @@ pub(crate) fn catalogue() -> Vec<RuleMetadata> {
             "contract outputs must establish their declared types explicitly",
             "Pass through a column whose exact type is proven, or wrap the complete output expression in an explicit CAST to its declared contract type.",
         ),
+        rule!(
+            "SQBRCONTRACT106",
+            "contracts",
+            "typed-contract-columns",
+            "enforced contract columns must declare types",
+            "Declare an adapter type for every column in the enforced contract; fix upstream type inference or cast the SQL output before choosing the type.",
+        ),
         rule!(
             "SQBRDECLARATION101",
             "declarations",
 
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ use crate::constants::{
 use crate::models::{Declaration, EvaluateRequest, Fault, Model, RuleMetadata, RulesConfig};
 use crate::rules::_helpers::authored_literals::numeric_literal_tokens;
 use crate::rules::_helpers::domain_layout::folder_layer_details;
-use crate::rules::_helpers::explicit_output_types;
+use crate::rules::_helpers::{explicit_output_types, typed_contract_columns};
 use crate::rules::models::{
     FaultCollector, ModelEvaluationRequest, ProjectEvaluationRequest, ResolvedThresholdOverride,
 };
@@ -176,6 +176,9 @@ fn evaluate_model_inner(request: ModelEvaluationRequest<'_>) -> Result<Vec<Fault
     if let Some(rule) = metadata("SQBRCONTRACT101") {
         contract_required(&parsed, rule, &faults);
     }
+    if let Some(rule) = metadata("SQBRCONTRACT106") {
+        typed_contract_columns::evaluate(parsed.model, rule, &faults);
+    }
     if let Some(rule) = metadata("SQBRCONTRACT105") {
         explicit_output_types::evaluate(&parsed.query, parsed.model, rule, &faults);
     }
 
@@ -4,3 +4,4 @@ pub(crate) mod domain_layout;
 pub(crate) mod evaluation;
 pub(crate) mod explicit_output_types;
 pub(crate) mod sql_test_rules;
+pub(crate) mod typed_contract_columns;
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+use crate::constants::ENFORCED_CONTRACT;
+use crate::models::{Fault, Model, RuleMetadata};
+use crate::rules::models::FaultCollector;
+
+pub(crate) fn evaluate(model: &Model, rule: &RuleMetadata, faults: &FaultCollector) {
+    if model
+        .config
+        .get("contract")
+        .and_then(serde_json::Value::as_str)
+        != Some(ENFORCED_CONTRACT)
+    {
+        return;
+    }
+    for column in &model.columns {
+        if column.data_type.trim().is_empty() {
+            faults.push(Fault {
+                code: rule.code.clone(),
+                path: model.relative_path.clone(),
+                line: 1,
+                column: 1,
+                message: format!("contract column {:?} has no declared type", column.name),
+                remediation: rule.remediation.clone(),
+            });
+        }
+    }
+}
@@ -83,6 +83,11 @@ Contract type validation distinguishes evidence from uncertainty:
 - An output whose type cannot be proven reports `K003` when type enforcement is active. This remains
   a warning because incomplete analysis is not proof that otherwise valid SQL violates its contract.
 
+`SQBRCONTRACT106` requires every column in an enforced contract to declare an adapter type. Use it
+with `SQBRCONTRACT101` so every model has an enforced contract and no contract can remain a
+name-only shape. Resolve unknown types at authoritative sources or explicit SQL output boundaries;
+do not choose a type solely to silence the Rule.
+
 Projects that require every contract boundary to be statically explicit can select
 `SQBRCONTRACT105`. Selected Rule findings are enforced. The Rule accepts a direct column only when
 its exact declared type is proven, and requires an outer `CAST` around literals, calculations,
 
@@ -34,6 +34,18 @@ class ExplicitContractOutputRuleIntegrationTestCase:
     columns_sql: str = "order_id (type INTEGER)"
 
 
+@dataclass(frozen=True)
+class TypedContractRuleIntegrationTestCase:
+    """One fully typed contract Rule expectation through compile."""
+
+    description: str
+    columns_sql: str
+    expected_exit_code: int
+    expected_contract_101_findings: int
+    expected_contract_105_findings: int
+    expected_contract_106_findings: int
+
+
 @dataclass(frozen=True)
 class FormatCompileIntegrationTestCase:
     """One format-to-compile compatibility expectation."""
 
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
     ExplicitContractOutputRuleIntegrationTestCase,
     RulePassIntegrationTestCase,
     RulesIntegrationTestCase,
+    TypedContractRuleIntegrationTestCase,
 )
 
 
@@ -240,6 +241,60 @@ def test_given_enforced_contract_when_compiling_explicit_output_rule_then_enforc
     assert diagnostic_codes.count("SQBRCONTRACT105") == test_case.expected_rule_findings
 
 
+@pytest.mark.parametrize(
+    "test_case",
+    (
+        TypedContractRuleIntegrationTestCase(
+            description="enforced contract with an untyped column fails only the typed-column rule",
+            columns_sql='order_id (type INTEGER), status (description "Current status")',
+            expected_exit_code=1,
+            expected_contract_101_findings=0,
+            expected_contract_105_findings=0,
+            expected_contract_106_findings=1,
+        ),
+        TypedContractRuleIntegrationTestCase(
+            description="enforced contract with fully typed explicit outputs passes",
+            columns_sql="order_id (type INTEGER), status (type VARCHAR)",
+            expected_exit_code=0,
+            expected_contract_101_findings=0,
+            expected_contract_105_findings=0,
+            expected_contract_106_findings=0,
+        ),
+    ),
+    ids=lambda case: case.description,
+)
+def test_given_contract_rules_when_compiling_then_contract_is_enforced_typed_and_explicit(
+    test_case: TypedContractRuleIntegrationTestCase,
+    tmp_path: Path,
+    capsys: pytest.CaptureFixture[str],
+) -> None:
+    (tmp_path / "sqlbuild_project.toml").write_text(
+        'name = "orders"\nadapter = "duckdb"\n\n[rules]\n'
+        'select = ["SQBRCONTRACT101", "SQBRCONTRACT105", "SQBRCONTRACT106"]\n',
+        encoding="utf-8",
+    )
+    model: Path = tmp_path / "models" / "orders.sql"
+    model.parent.mkdir()
+    model.write_text(
+        "MODEL (\n"
+        "  contract enforced,\n"
+        f"  columns ({test_case.columns_sql}),\n"
+        ");\n\n"
+        "SELECT CAST(1 AS INTEGER) AS order_id, CAST('ready' AS VARCHAR) AS status\n",
+        encoding="utf-8",
+    )
+
+    exit_code: int = main(["--project-dir", str(tmp_path), "compile", "--json", "--no-cache"])
+    result: dict[str, object] = json.loads(capsys.readouterr().out)
+    diagnostics: list[dict[str, object]] = cast(list[dict[str, object]], result["diagnostics"])
+    diagnostic_codes: tuple[object, ...] = tuple(item["code"] for item in diagnostics)
+
+    assert exit_code == test_case.expected_exit_code
+    assert diagnostic_codes.count("SQBRCONTRACT101") == (test_case.expected_contract_101_findings)
+    assert diagnostic_codes.count("SQBRCONTRACT105") == (test_case.expected_contract_105_findings)
+    assert diagnostic_codes.count("SQBRCONTRACT106") == (test_case.expected_contract_106_findings)
+
+
 @pytest.mark.parametrize(
     "test_case",
     [RulesIntegrationTestCase("selected SQL rule blocks artifacts", 1, "SQBRSQL004")],
 
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
     "SQBRCONTRACT103",
     "SQBRCONTRACT104",
     "SQBRCONTRACT105",
+    "SQBRCONTRACT106",
     "SQBRDECLARATION101",
     "SQBRDECLARATION102",
     "SQBRDECLARATION201",
@@ -86,6 +87,7 @@
             "SQBRCONTRACT103",
             "SQBRCONTRACT104",
             "SQBRCONTRACT105",
+            "SQBRCONTRACT106",
             "SQBRDECLARATION101",
             "SQBRDECLARATION102",
             "SQBRDECLARATION201",