Repository navigation
docs(g01): record capture-boundary CI pass - #169
Conversation
|
@codex review |
Codex Review Summary: ✅ CompletedThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Hooray! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
|
@codex review |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. What shall we delve into next? Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
|
Independent-review finding triage (documentation scope, nonblocking): the earlier sentence generalized beyond the evidence in Public CI run 43406858323. Resolution: narrowed it to state only that this run did not execute the separately authorized live canary. Re-review at 7744cbb: APPROVE. GitHub Codex reviewed the same head and found no major issues; the hosted Go check passed. No code behavior changed. |
Updates docs/evidence/g01-live-canary.md with PR #168 exact merge, review and quick-check evidence, plus Public CI run 43406858323 on merge SHA 3bfc366 (all 10 jobs passed). Documentation-only; this does not close issue #1 or claim live canary qualification. git diff --check passes; no application tests were added or run.