Repository navigation
Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
|
Superseded by the same commits from a branch that doesn't need a force-push. |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 7780164206
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| 'SKIP' | ||
| 'SKIP' | ||
| 'SKIP' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The checksum array is positional, but these three new SKIP entries precede the existing pnpm and libloot hashes while the new patch sources were appended after those archives. Thus the pnpm hash is applied to 0002-linux-path-and-executable-discovery.patch (and every subsequent entry remains shifted; the final source has no checksum), so makepkg rejects the recipe during integrity verification and the 2.6.2 Arch/AppImage build cannot complete.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Brings the older recipes up to the current Linux fixes.
scripts/build-version.py --version 2.6.2, package and AppImage.build-version.pynow refuses a recipe whose.SRCINFOchecksums don't pair with its sources, before downloading anything.