Skip to content

chore: revert the operator docs from #25292 (in-tree docs/ is gone) - #25377

Merged
nventuro merged 1 commit into
merge-train/spartanfrom
jan/revert-operator-docs-25292
Sep 1, 2026
Merged

chore: revert the operator docs from #25292 (in-tree docs/ is gone)#25377
nventuro merged 1 commit into
merge-train/spartanfrom
jan/revert-operator-docs-25292

Conversation

@benesjan

@benesjan benesjan commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Unblocks #25375.

#25292 edited four files under the in-tree docs/, which #25321 deleted (those components are now built from the labs/ submodule). Every merge of next into the train therefore hits a modify/delete conflict on:

  • docs/docs-operate/operators/prerequisites.md
  • docs/docs-operate/operators/setup/staking-provider.md
  • docs/network_versioned_docs/version-v5.2.0/operators/prerequisites.md
  • docs/network_versioned_docs/version-v5.2.0/operators/setup/staking-provider.md

Reverting restores those files to their pre-#25292 content, so next's deletion applies cleanly and the automated next-to-train merge succeeds.

The docs content is re-landed against docs/ in aztec-node: aztec-labs-eng/aztec-node#112.

…for operators (#25292)"

This reverts commit cc407ca.

#25321 deleted the in-tree `docs/`, which is now built from the `labs/`
submodule, so these edits conflict with every merge of `next` into the
train and block #25375. The content is re-landed against `docs/` in
aztec-node instead.
@benesjan benesjan changed the title revert: "docs: Node.js prerequisite and staking key security warning for operators (#25292)" chore: revert the operator docs from #25292 (in-tree docs/ is gone) Sep 1, 2026
@benesjan
benesjan requested a review from nventuro September 1, 2026 13:44
@nventuro
nventuro merged commit d558569 into merge-train/spartan Sep 1, 2026
17 of 19 checks passed
@nventuro
nventuro deleted the jan/revert-operator-docs-25292 branch September 1, 2026 13:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants