Repository navigation
Clarify schedule findings and keep source evidence accessible - #18
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
ProjectLens now shows the schedule movement and conflicting update claim together, explains its supported export format and review metrics, and places source metadata behind labelled disclosures. Exact source fields, human decisions and exports remain available. The contradiction title asks for clarification without paraphrasing the supplied narrative.
Validation: all seven browser suites and eight asset checks pass locally, including own files, revised narratives, drafts, decisions, export, conditions, keyboard, reduced motion, recovery and five widths. CI runs the full Python suite and browser journeys. Native Claude and Cursor reviewed the clarity changes; follow-up findings were resolved. No new demand or comprehension claims.