adds support for get/set_element - #256
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Member
Author
|
green! |
jwaldrop107
approved these changes
Sep 3, 2026
Contributor
|
🚀 [bumpr] Bumped! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Is this pull request associated with an issue(s)?
No.
Description
Title. Using
get_element/set_elementwill not be performant, but for debugging/prototyping this should make things a lot easier. I have to think about what a more performant element access API would look like (probably like TA's visitor-like pattern), but I'm going to punt that to another PR.TODOs
None. R2g.