Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade io.vertx:vertx-core from 3.8.5 to 4.5.32 - #328

Open
benjaminhuo wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
snyk-fix-f65b9d838a71533170671cf144651156
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade io.vertx:vertx-core from 3.8.5 to 4.5.32#328
benjaminhuo wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
snyk-fix-f65b9d838a71533170671cf144651156

Conversation

@benjaminhuo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the maven dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • builders/testdata/java/vertx-helloworld/pom.xml

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score Upgrade
high severity Use of Cache Containing Sensitive Information
SNYK-JAVA-IONETTY-18956131
  701   io.vertx:vertx-core:
3.8.5 -> 4.5.32
Major version upgrade No Known Exploit

Breaking Change Risk

Merge Risk: High

Notice: This assessment is enhanced by AI.


Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

@benjaminhuo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Merge Risk: High

The upgrade from Vert.x 3.8.5 to 4.5.32 is a major version jump that introduces significant and breaking API changes, requiring a considerable migration effort.

Key Breaking Changes:

  • Asynchronous Model (Futures): Vert.x 4 shifts its core asynchronous programming model from callbacks to Futures. [1, 3] While many callback APIs still exist to ease migration, the idiomatic approach is now Future-based. [4] This includes:

    • Future.setHandler() has been removed and replaced by onComplete(), onSuccess(), and onFailure(). [6]
    • Future now directly implements Handler<AsyncResult<T>>, and the completer() method is removed. [6]
  • API Removals and Method Signature Changes:

    • EventBus: The send() method for request-response has been removed and must be replaced with request(). [1]
    • WriteStream: The write() and end() methods are no longer fluent (i.e., they do not return the stream instance). They now return void or Future<Void>, which will break any chained calls. [1, 5]
    • MessageProducer: This interface no longer extends WriteStream. [1]
    • Deprecated APIs: Any API marked as deprecated in Vert.x 3.x has been removed in 4.x. [1]
  • Component Updates:

    • Authentication: vertx-auth-shiro is deprecated and replaced by new modules like vertx-auth-properties and vertx-auth-ldap. [2, 11]
    • SQL Clients: The upgrade introduces new high-performance reactive SQL clients, which may require rewriting database interaction logic. [2]

Source: Vert.x 3 to 4 Migration Guide

Recommendation: This upgrade cannot be completed without significant code refactoring. Developers must follow the official migration guide to address the changes in the asynchronous model and update calls to removed or modified APIs. A dedicated effort should be planned for this migration.

Notice 🤖: This content was augmented using artificial intelligence. AI-generated content may contain errors and should be reviewed for accuracy before use.

@CLAassistant

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants