clone: classify CHOOSING_YOUR_AI_TOOL.md as mixed - #228
Merged
Conversation
autolens_assistant's clone-boundary CI has been red since the file landed
on its main in 64018f8 ("Release 2026.8.17.1"):
check_boundary: 1 file(s) in autolens_assistant fall on neither side
of the template boundary:
✗ CHOOSING_YOUR_AI_TOOL.md
This blocks every PR against that repo, and — the reason the check exists —
would block every future assistant birth.
The classification is not a new decision. autolens_assistant's
modes/maintainer.md, the prose that owns the boundary, already files it
under '**Mixed**': "the free-tier chat surface — CHOOSING_YOUR_AI_TOOL.md
and the generated llms-chat.txt (the per-platform setup mechanics clone
verbatim; the worked prompts, dataset names and API rules are domain)".
Only the code side was missing, so the two had drifted apart.
Added to _SHARED_MIXED next to llms-chat.txt and FREE_TIER_SETUP.md, the
two files the same sentence groups it with. The file exists only in
autolens_assistant today; an unmatched pattern is inert for the other
references, and a sibling that grows the same page inherits the same call.
Verified with the checker CI runs:
before: exit 1, CHOOSING_YOUR_AI_TOOL.md unclassified
after: exit 0, boundary complete — generic 59 · domain 324 · mixed 92
autofit_assistant still passes; autogalaxy_assistant has no profile and
correctly skips.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The problem
autolens_assistant'sclone-boundaryCI has been red since the file landed on itsmainin64018f8("Release 2026.8.17.1"):This currently fails every PR against that repo — it surfaced on
autolens_assistant#112, an unrelatedhpc/syncbug fix. And it is exactly the condition the checker exists to catch: while it stands, the Clone Agent refuses to birth any newborn.The fix is not a new decision
autolens_assistant'smodes/maintainer.md— the prose that owns the boundary — already classifies this file under**Mixed**(line 101):Only the code side was missing, so the two sources drifted apart. This restores agreement rather than deciding anything new — no change to
maintainer.mdis needed.Placed in
_SHARED_MIXEDbesidellms-chat.txtandFREE_TIER_SETUP.md, the two files that same sentence groups it with. The page exists only inautolens_assistanttoday; an unmatched pattern is inert for the other references, and a sibling that grows the same page inherits the same call.Verification
Ran the exact checker CI invokes, against a real
autolens_assistantcheckout:exit 1—CHOOSING_YOUR_AI_TOOL.mdunclassifiedexit 0— boundary complete: generic 59 · domain 324 · mixed 92No regression on the other references:
autofit_assistantstill reports boundary complete (generic 104 · domain 20 · mixed 21);autogalaxy_assistanthas no profile and correctly skips.Merge order
autolens_assistant#112declaresBrain-refpointing at this branch, so it can go green before this merges. Merge this one first, then #112 picks the same classification up frommain.Generated by Claude Code