prompt: autofit-plot-functions-kwargs shipped (PyAutoFit#1524) - #302
Merged
Conversation
…ibrary Issue PyAutoFit#1523 filed for the `autofit.plot` silent-**kwargs defect. Prompt advances draft/bug/autofit/ → active/; task registered in active.md as library-dev claiming PyAutoFit + autofit_workspace. Fix direction approved by the human: forward **kwargs with a strict signature filter, so unrecognised names raise TypeError instead of vanishing into corner's hist2d sink. Scope extended to a second silent defect found while verifying — corner_cornerpy passes weight_list= to corner.corner, which has no such parameter (it is weights), so sample weights are ignored on every weighted corner plot. Brain bug agent and the sizing faculty both scored the prompt too-large (13) and advised phasing; overridden deliberately and recorded on the issue. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01G8EXazf2FEqf4S9UpTwMGV
…e.md web-github session, so no local worktree: the claim records the clones and the py3.12 venv instead. Branches created in both repos. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01G8EXazf2FEqf4S9UpTwMGV
Status advances to ready-to-ship. PyAutoFit 8cdcff3 and the paired autofit_workspace commit are on claude/autofit-plot-functions-kwargs-vvwj5x in each repo; no PRs opened yet. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01G8EXazf2FEqf4S9UpTwMGV
Library PR PyAutoFit#1524 and paired workspace PR autofit_workspace#148 both open and labelled pending-release. Status advances to library-shipped, workspace-pending; the workspace PR waits on the library-first merge gate. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01G8EXazf2FEqf4S9UpTwMGV
PyAutoFit#1524 merged as 56f1b87 and autofit_workspace#148 as 5056fa3, in library-first order; both branches proven merged before recording. Issue #1523 closed. Prompt advances active/ -> complete/2026/08/autofit-plot-functions-kwargs.md. The record keeps the two findings worth carrying: corner.corner's own **kwargs sink (which is why plain forwarding would not have fixed the tutorials), and the weight_list=/weights= defect that had every weighted corner posterior rendering unweighted. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01G8EXazf2FEqf4S9UpTwMGV
Resolves the three-way conflict on the generated pages. main had moved 14 commits ahead (PyAutoBrain#267/#269 close-out plus the dashboard self-heal), and both sides had regenerated complete/index.md, dashboard.md and dashboard.html from different record sets. All three conflicts were in GENERATED files, so none was hand-resolved: took main's side and re-ran the generators over the merged tree -- lifecycle.py index --apply (1122 records: main's 1121 plus this branch's autofit-plot-functions-kwargs) and pyauto-brain intake dashboard --apply (140 prompts). The curated Highlights band in index.md survived, as its markers intend. This branch's own content is untouched: the completion record stands and its draft prompt stays folded out. Verified on the merged tree: lifecycle check OK, index --check OK, repos_sync --check all 11 legs OK, no conflict markers. Merged rather than rebased -- this branch belongs to another session and its pushed history is not rewritten. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MPhEXMoPYa7H1sNHWR2GNW
The Dashboard Refresh check failed on the merge commit even though the pages had just been regenerated. Cause: this session's PyAutoBrain checkout was 37 commits behind origin/main, so every render used a stale renderer AND a stale config/policy.yaml. The dashboard census classifies prompts through repo_aliases, which PyAutoBrain#268/#271 changed, and the renderer itself gained the freshness banner and refresh block in #265 -- so CI, which runs the renderer from PyAutoBrain main, correctly saw the committed pages as stale. Fast-forwarded the Brain checkout to origin/main and re-ran `intake dashboard --apply`. `dashboard --check` now reports the pages current against the same renderer CI uses. lifecycle check OK, index --check OK, repos_sync --check 0 mismatches. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MPhEXMoPYa7H1sNHWR2GNW
github-actions
Bot
deleted the
claude/autofit-plot-functions-kwargs-vvwj5x
branch
August 25, 2026 14:01
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Mind state for the
autofit-plot-functions-kwargstask, from intake through close-out. The code shipped in PyAutoLabs/PyAutoFit#1524 (merged56f1b87) and PyAutoLabs/autofit_workspace#148 (merged5056fa3); issue PyAutoLabs/PyAutoFit#1523 is closed.This session ran on a feature branch rather than pushing Mind to
maindirectly, so the lifecycle commits need this PR to land.What's in it
draft/bug/autofit/plot_functions_discard_kwargs.md→active/→complete/2026/08/autofit-plot-functions-kwargs.md(vialifecycle.py record, prompt folded in under## Original prompt)active.md— task registered, advanced throughlibrary-dev→ready-to-ship→library-shipped, then released by the recordcomplete/index.md— regenerated (1120 records)dashboard.md/dashboard.html— regenerated viapyauto-brain intake --apply dashboardlifecycle.py check→ OK.lifecycle.py index --check→ OK.Why the record is worth reading
Two findings generalise beyond this task:
corner.cornerhas its own**kwargssink. Unrecognised names reachhist2d(**kwargs), whose body reads onlyextentand drops the rest. So "just forward**kwargs" would not have fixed the tutorials — 18 of their 76 kwargs would have stayed silently ignored one layer deeper. Validating against named parameters only is what closes it, and that shape recurs for any wrapper over a library with a**kwargssink.weight_list=vsweights=.corner_cornerpypassed a name corner does not have, so every weighted corner posterior had been rendering unweighted — silently, for as long as that call existed. Found by reading corner's real signature rather than trusting the call site.The record also carries the traps (anesthetic's
figsizearriving through**fig_kw,@log_plot_exceptionswallowingTypeError, monkeypatching breaking signature validation), two follow-ups left deliberately undone, and a sizing calibration note — the Brain bug agent and sizing faculty both scored thistoo-large (13)and advised phasing; the override was correct.Generated by Claude Code