Repository navigation
perf: evaluate Parquet Bloom filters incrementally during row group pruning #25811
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
mohitgurav20
wants to merge
8
commits into
apache:main
Choose a base branch
from
mohitgurav20:fix/incremental-bloom-filter-pruning
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+748
−132
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2accb64
bench: add parquet bloom filter pruning benchmarks
mohitgurav20 9b4700c
perf(datasource-parquet): evaluate Parquet Bloom filters incrementall…
mohitgurav20 9e1e329
refactor(bloom): eliminate duplication, encapsulate pruning, drop cri…
mohitgurav20 8211945
Merge branch 'main' into fix/incremental-bloom-filter-pruning
mohitgurav20 a33d7db
Merge branch 'main' into fix/incremental-bloom-filter-pruning
mohitgurav20 2e1c7bc
Merge branch 'main' into fix/incremental-bloom-filter-pruning
mohitgurav20 f1f266e
Merge remote-tracking branch 'apache/main' into fix/incremental-bloom…
mohitgurav20 9273c08
test(parquet): update Bloom filter I/O snapshot for incremental pruning
mohitgurav20 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am surprised that there are no other changes -- I would think we should have a test showing that this change now effectively interleaves IO and compute
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes total sense.
@haohuaijin could you take a quick look when you have time? You opened #25797 for multi-column observability workloads, so your input on this flow would be really helpful here.
On the test snapshot:
matchingstill reads both columns because both match. The interleaving shows up inpruned, where request 5 (colb) is completely dropped becauseais fetched and evaluated first, pruning the row group beforebis ever fetched. Happy to add a multi-row-group test as well if you'd like.