Skip to content

🛡️ Sentinel: [CRITICAL] Fix command validation bypass - #314

Closed
bobdivx wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/workdir-cmd-bypass-9622733287554093035
Closed

bobdivx wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/workdir-cmd-bypass-9622733287554093035

Conversation

@bobdivx

@bobdivx bobdivx commented Nov 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

🚨 Severity: CRITICAL
💡 Vulnerability: Command validation in workdir_cmd.rs relied on joined strings for multi-word blocked phrases (rm ), which allowed an attacker to bypass it by placing the sensitive token at the end of the command string without a trailing space (e.g., npm run rm).
🎯 Impact: Allowed execution of blocked commands like rm and sudo in the workdir.
🔧 Fix: Added explicit exact token match checks for sensitive binaries in validate_command.
✅ Verification: Run cargo test -p devforge-agent --lib tools::workdir_cmd::tests and observe the new test passes.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 9622733287554093035 started by @bobdivx

…ation

Previously, `validate_command` only checked if a padded token (e.g., `rm `)
was in the joined command string. This allowed malicious payloads like `npm run rm`
where the exact token had no trailing space to bypass the check.

This commit adds a loop to iterate through every parsed token and verifies exact
matches against sensitive binaries ("rm", "sudo", "chmod", "chown", "curl", "wget", "ssh", "scp").

Co-authored-by: bobdivx <6737167+bobdivx@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@bobdivx

bobdivx commented Nov 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Closing as a duplicate: #283 already covers the same command validation bypass in workdir_cmd.rs and is kept open for review (security-sensitive).

@bobdivx bobdivx closed this Nov 9, 2026
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closing as a duplicate: #283 already covers the same command validation bypass in workdir_cmd.rs and is kept open for review (security-sensitive).

Understood. Acknowledging that this work is a duplicate and stopping work on this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant