Skip to content

Issues-83: Custom function pipe error - #85

Closed
sergeevik wants to merge 1 commit into
dashjoin:mainfrom
sergeevik:fix/pipe-call-and-input
Closed

sergeevik wants to merge 1 commit into
dashjoin:mainfrom
sergeevik:fix/pipe-call-and-input

Conversation

@sergeevik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

fix: pipe call custom function with input data

fix: pipe call custom function with input data
@sergeevik
sergeevik force-pushed the fix/pipe-call-and-input branch from d0fe269 to db5d421 Compare January 25, 2026 21:09
@sergeevik sergeevik changed the title Custom function pipe error #83 Issues-83: Custom function pipe error Jan 25, 2026
aeberhart added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2026
Tests contributed by @sergeevik in the earlier PRs, adapted to the
existing API. All pass with the partial application changes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@aeberhart

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks a lot @sergeevik for reporting #83 and for this PR! It is now fixed on main by #133: the arity of a custom function is taken from its lambda (Fn0–Fn8) or signature, or from the number of args supplied at the partial application, so no explicit numberOfArgs constructor is needed. Your test cases were added to OldPrsTest using the existing constructor. Closing this one as superseded.

@aeberhart aeberhart closed this Nov 5, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants