Skip to content

docs: drop the undefined node bonding fee from relay funding - #329

Closed
yigitdot wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/node-bonding-fees-docs-592f1f
Closed

yigitdot wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/node-bonding-fees-docs-592f1f

Conversation

@yigitdot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

docs/protocol/network.mdx (NAT traversal) said relays are funded "from the protocol treasury or from node bonding fees". No bonding or registration fee exists anywhere in the protocol: the ADRs (decdn/decdn/adr) define no such fee — the capacity bond is locked and returned on unbonding, and the only fee flows are the FeeRouter settlement splits (ADR 026). The protocol treasury is a defined, funded entity (15% DAO allocation + the 10% FeeRouter treasury share), so the sentence now names it alone.

Picked over "the treasury share of settlement fees" because that would understate the treasury's funding sources (the DAO allocation also feeds it).

Note: the phrase originated in decdn/decdn/adr/architecture.md ("funded from protocol treasury or node staking fees"), which still carries the same undefined fee — fixing that at the source is a follow-up in that repo.

Closes #328

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Closes #328

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings October 20, 2026 18:56

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

An organization owner can choose the repository organization as the billing source for reviews requested by members with a paid Copilot license. Learn about Copilot code review billing.

@cloudflare-workers-and-pages

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploying website with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: 4cfc3d7
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://aaa28fd9.website-70y.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://claude-node-bonding-fees-doc.website-70y.pages.dev

View logs

@yigitdot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Closing unmerged. The source ADR (decdn/decdn adr/architecture.md, iroh relay availability) phrases this as advisory operational guidance — deployments should self-host relays as operational infrastructure — not as a protocol-defined fee flow. The funding clause lists possible funding sources for infrastructure a deployment runs itself, so it does not define (or require) an on-chain bonding fee, and the website intentionally mirrors the ADR wording. Rewording here alone would make the site diverge from the ADR. See #328 for the resolution.

@yigitdot yigitdot closed this Oct 20, 2026
@yigitdot
yigitdot deleted the claude/node-bonding-fees-docs-592f1f branch October 23, 2026 23:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

docs: 'node bonding fees' names a fee the protocol doesn't define

2 participants