Skip to content

fix: initialize optional coverage args and test JSON alias boundaries - #6

Merged
loong10k merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/main-argline-json-regressions
Nov 3, 2026
Merged

loong10k merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/main-argline-json-regressions

Conversation

@loong10k

@loong10k loong10k commented Nov 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Direct surefire:test fails to start its JVM when JaCoCo prepare-agent has not initialized @{argLine}. Define an empty default while retaining late agent substitution for normal verify. CI now runs direct Surefire and tests with jacoco.skip=true after the coverage build.

Add separate JSON regressions for canonical/legacy equal output, both conflicting input orders (last property in document order wins), and nested HTTP config binding. No serialization behavior is changed: current main emits both names. Historical pre-rename code emitted serverUrl; the rename emitted baseUrl. Selecting canonical-only output would need a separate compatibility decision.

JDK 17 local validation: clean verify, direct surefire:test, and clean verify -Djacoco.skip=true each pass 266 tests, no failures/errors/skips. Normal coverage remains below the unchanged 90% warning threshold (56.02%). No changes to bot PR #3, other version lines, releases, or security settings.

@loong10k
loong10k marked this pull request as ready for review November 3, 2026 23:23
@loong10k
loong10k merged commit f49d909 into main Nov 3, 2026
1 check passed
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-03T23:24:18.022945Z 80b6ce3 Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant