Skip to content

Update Log4j security baseline while retaining Boot 2.1 logging bridges - #2

Merged
loong10k merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/main-log4j-security
Nov 4, 2026
Merged

loong10k merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/main-log4j-security

Conversation

@loong10k

@loong10k loong10k commented Nov 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Both applications resolve Log4j Core 2.11.2 at compile scope through Boot's Log4j starter, within Apache's CVE-2021-44228 affected range. This confirms an affected dependency, not an exploitable deployment input path.

Override Boot's log4j2.version to Java 8 compatible 2.26.1, aligning API/Core/JUL/Web and the existing SLF4J 1.x bridge. Preserve Boot 2.1.4, SLF4J 1.7, public production API, deployment and JMX settings. Add real Boot logging initialization and Log4j/SLF4J/Spring JCL/JUL routing tests, literal message lookup and disabled default JNDI checks. CI checks actual dependency alignment and excludes circular/competing logging bridges.

Validation: Java 8/17/21 each passed all six tests locally. Effective POM/dependency checks passed. Validation stops at test; no images built/tagged/pushed, no deployment, no weakened security defaults.

@loong10k
loong10k marked this pull request as ready for review November 4, 2026 01:02
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Nov 4, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-04T01:03:06.230664Z d649bc7 Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@loong10k
loong10k merged commit 3f673c5 into main Nov 4, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant