[REPPL]

Brings the brief single-home records into the record, checked against the one-home principle (#1243) so the two don't restate each other.

• adr-2610290238168123: each command's behaviour lives once, in its command page, which the documentation-fidelity check reads. The brief states the design and why, as the target design, with a status tag where a part is built. It supersedes adr-2609231028044006, whose shape rule it carries forward. Its first decision now names the principle instead of restating it. The ADR index is regenerated.
• The brief-size study of 2026-10-25 is in the research notes as the ADR's evidence.
• itd-2610290239150589, a draft intent for the brief rewrite itself, which the deferred consistency majors wait on.
• dcn-2610271112331508 keeps its dated event and now points to the principle for the rule, and to the intent's scope for what the ruling means for the brief.
• Corrections: the ADR and the intent both said most of the 2026-10-26 consistency pass's records came from the command chapters' second copy. That pass compared the brief and the intents and read no command page. Both now say what its summary supports: 1,080 of its 1,307 findings had a passage of the brief at one end. A quoted phrase in the ADR's rejected alternatives is reworded.
• iss-2610300120250873 (minor): a rules domain names its home with a bare path that nothing resolves, so a renamed principle leaves a dead pointer the loader keeps injecting while every check stays green.

Records only, with no code change.

Commits:

• docs: record the ADR for one home of behaviour, and file the brief rewrite
• docs: say what the consistency pass compared, in the ADR and the rewrite intent
• docs: file the rules-domain paths that nothing resolves
• docs: point the one-home ruling and the ADR at their homes instead of restating them

Refs: iss-2610300120250873
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5-5