Skip to content

docs: clarify workflow integration and service scope - #4

Merged
Lu-ITC merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/workflow-positioning-20261031
Oct 31, 2026
Merged

Lu-ITC merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/workflow-positioning-20261031

Conversation

@Lu-ITC

@Lu-ITC Lu-ITC commented Oct 31, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Add a short explanation of how this tool fits an accountable workflow, with a relevant ITC service link and explicit integration boundaries. Preserve installation structure, license notices and security guidance.

Validation: python3 -m unittest discover -s tests: 42 tests passed on Python 3.14.3. git diff --check, local Markdown links and unique headings passed. The referenced ITC service URLs returned HTTP 200. Existing fenced examples are unchanged except the verified npm/tag version pins where applicable. No functionality, permissions, licenses or release artifacts change.


Note

Low Risk
Documentation-only README change with no code, configuration, or runtime behavior impact.

Overview
Adds a Using a handoff in a workflow section to the README, placed before Contributing.

It states that a passing structural check is only a starting point for the next reviewer—they must still validate evidence, authority, and acceptance criteria—and that the CLI does not integrate with task systems or prove an end-to-end handoff process.

It also links ITC’s IT Operations Workflow Review consulting offering and notes that implementation and ongoing operations are out of scope for that engagement.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 167815e. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@Lu-ITC
Lu-ITC marked this pull request as ready for review October 31, 2026 15:38
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 31, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-31T15:39:13.225372Z 167815e Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@cursor

cursor Bot commented Oct 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Bugbot couldn't run - usage limit reached

Bugbot is counted against Cursor usage for this user or team, and this run hit a usage or spend limit.

A user or team admin can review and increase usage limits in the Cursor dashboard.

(requestId: 55f4b0fc-1a17-4d4b-8c2e-650b9a19421a)

@Lu-ITC
Lu-ITC merged commit f2e14af into main Oct 31, 2026
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant