Skip to content

feat: Add the override store, overlay, and data system wiring - #527

Merged
kinyoklion merged 10 commits into
feat/overridesfrom
rlamb/overrides-python-override-store
Nov 10, 2026
Merged

kinyoklion merged 10 commits into
feat/overridesfrom
rlamb/overrides-python-override-store

Conversation

@kinyoklion

@kinyoklion kinyoklion commented Sep 25, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

This is the third step of the flag overrides port described by the OVERRIDE specification. It is based on the model marker branch because the phases are stacked; retarget to feat/overrides once that branch merges.

The override layer (ldclient/impl/overrides). OverrideLayer is the override store: it holds marked shallow copies of the flag and segment definitions a source supplies, keyed by key, and is replaced wholesale on each update, so the layer's contents are exactly one snapshot at any instant and an empty snapshot clears it. Dictionaries are decoded with the model constructors, and an invalid definition raises rather than being defaulted. A definition whose key differs from its key in the snapshot raises too, and the layer is left unchanged: evaluation reads an entry by its snapshot key, while the all-flags state and events use the definition's key. OverrideStoreView is the overlay at the store read boundary: a read of a flag or segment returns the override entry when one exists and the LaunchDarkly entry otherwise, whatever the state of the base store, and an enumeration is the union of both with the override entry winning, including over a deleted item. A failure of the base enumeration propagates, as it does without the overlay. When that read fails, all_flags_state logs the failure as before and, if the override layer holds flags, returns a state of those flags marked invalid rather than an empty one: overrides only add to the state, and a client-side SDK bootstrapped from it uses its flags whatever $valid says, so the overridden values still reach it. With no override flags the state is the same invalid, empty state as without a source. The sink stops accepting snapshots when the client is closed, and when the source fails to start it also clears what the source supplied. OverrideSinkImpl applies each snapshot as one serialized operation and notifies flag change listeners of every flag whose merged-view evaluation may have changed: entries added, removed, or changed, plus every flag that depends on them through prerequisites or segment references. An identical snapshot notifies nothing.

LaunchDarkly changes reach override dependents. The layer keeps a dependency graph of its entries, rebuilt on each replacement, and the store (sync and async) expands every changed LaunchDarkly item through both its own graph and the layer's, to a fixpoint. A change to a prerequisite flag or a segment that an override entry references therefore notifies that entry's flag, the same way dependent flags are notified for LaunchDarkly data, and a chain may cross between LaunchDarkly data and overrides any number of times. Without an override source the store's behavior is unchanged.

Configuration and wiring. OverrideSource and OverrideSink are public protocols in ldclient.interfaces, so a custom source can be supplied. OverrideSourceBuilder and DataSystemConfig.override_source (also on AsyncDataSystemConfig) plus ConfigBuilder.overrides(...) make the source an option of the FDv2 data system. The source is built with the data system, so invalid configuration raises from the client constructor like any other invalid component configuration. It starts before the data system's own threads and its initial load completes before the constructor returns; it is closed when the client is closed, after the sink stops accepting snapshots, and an exception from its close is logged. An exception from its start does not fail the constructor or start: the data system logs it, closes the source, clears any snapshot the source supplied before failing, and the client runs without overrides. The SDK's own file-based source does not raise from start; a custom source could. The source is not built or started when the client is offline, and the SDK logs a warning that it is not used. The data system's store becomes the overlay when a source is configured, so evaluation, prerequisite and segment resolution, and the all-flags read all see override precedence. The override source has no effect on initialization status, data availability, or data source status. The legacy FDv1 data system reports no override source. When the data system fails to start, the client constructor stops each component in turn and logs any failure to stop, so the event processor still stops and the caller receives the start failure.

The client facade. Both LDClient and AsyncLDClient consult the override layer before the not-initialized short-circuit: an overridden flag is served before the client has LaunchDarkly data, and a flag the layer does not hold takes exactly the path it took before this feature, so a configured but empty source changes nothing with the same warning and event as before. The all-flags state reads through the overlay. While the client has no LaunchDarkly data it contains only the flags the layer holds, read from the layer rather than the overlay so that LaunchDarkly data in a store without an init marker stays out (with a once-per-client warning), and it is invalid when the layer holds no flags. Without a source this state is empty, because the SDK reports no flags before the store is initialized, so the override flags only add to what it reports; overrides never remove a flag from the state. An evaluation that fails with an unexpected exception reports the EXCEPTION reason with overrideAffected when the flag came from the override layer, in a single evaluation and in the all-flags state (OVERRIDE 1.5.4); the marker is read through is_override_definition, so the error path cannot fail on an unexpected store item. On the async client, override change notifications are marshalled onto the event loop, like every other change notification.

The async client with a persistent store. The async client works out which flags an override change affects from the in-memory store, the only store it can read synchronously (async_fdv2.py). While a persistent store is the active store, a change to an override notifies the overridden flags, but not LaunchDarkly flags that depend on them through a prerequisite or a segment. The documentation of AsyncDataSystemConfig.override_source says so.

Left to later PRs in the stack.

Tests. Unit tests for the layer, overlay (sync and async), and sink; client tests for the gate, source lifecycle, construction errors, offline, precedence, prerequisite and segment overrides, all-flags state, and flag change and flag value change listeners, for both clients; and a runner for the OVERRIDE specification test vectors (ldclient/testing/testdata/override-vectors/vectors.json) through the full client stack. The vector runner's per-evaluation summary marker assertion is added with the events step.

SDK-3250


Note

Overview
Adds experimental flag/segment overrides that can take precedence over LaunchDarkly data at evaluation time, wired through FDv2 (sync and async).

Configuration: Optional override_source on the data system (ConfigBuilder.overrides(...), OverrideSourceBuilder, public OverrideSource / OverrideSink protocols). Offline clients skip building/starting the source.

Runtime: An OverrideLayer holds snapshot replacements; OverrideStoreView overlays the feature store so per-key reads prefer overrides; OverrideSinkImpl applies updates and fans out flag change notifications via merged-view dependency diffing. The store can register the layer as external dependencies so LaunchDarkly prerequisite/segment updates also notify affected override flags.

Clients: LDClient / AsyncLDClient read the override layer before the not-initialized default path and adjust all_flags_state to return override-only bootstrapping when LD data is unavailable (with once-per-client warnings). Evaluation errors set overrideAffected when the definition came from overrides. Sync client rolls back components if data system start fails.

Tests: Layer/overlay/sink units, broad sync+async client scenarios, store cross-graph notification, and OVERRIDE spec vectors (override-vectors/vectors.json).

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 0489514. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Opened from termag

@kinyoklion
kinyoklion force-pushed the rlamb/overrides-python-model-marker branch from 34322d8 to ee313c1 Compare September 28, 2026 20:28
@kinyoklion
kinyoklion force-pushed the rlamb/overrides-python-override-store branch from 3fcdc80 to 19f88eb Compare September 28, 2026 20:29
@kinyoklion
kinyoklion force-pushed the rlamb/overrides-python-model-marker branch from ee313c1 to 2c70075 Compare September 30, 2026 20:31
@kinyoklion
kinyoklion force-pushed the rlamb/overrides-python-override-store branch from 19f88eb to 7e7b3f4 Compare September 30, 2026 20:31
@kinyoklion
kinyoklion force-pushed the rlamb/overrides-python-model-marker branch from 2c70075 to 5f738a6 Compare October 1, 2026 23:43
@kinyoklion
kinyoklion force-pushed the rlamb/overrides-python-override-store branch from 7e7b3f4 to aa28264 Compare October 1, 2026 23:43
@kinyoklion
kinyoklion force-pushed the rlamb/overrides-python-model-marker branch from 5f738a6 to 0013c0e Compare October 3, 2026 01:18
@kinyoklion
kinyoklion force-pushed the rlamb/overrides-python-override-store branch from aa28264 to 1c1bd5c Compare October 3, 2026 01:18
@kinyoklion

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

bugbot review

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Stale Bugbot comment from a previous run.

Comment thread ldclient/client.py Resolved
@kinyoklion
kinyoklion force-pushed the rlamb/overrides-python-model-marker branch from 0013c0e to 85a71df Compare October 13, 2026 21:02
@kinyoklion
kinyoklion force-pushed the rlamb/overrides-python-override-store branch from 1c1bd5c to 3cd92be Compare October 13, 2026 21:02
@kinyoklion
kinyoklion force-pushed the rlamb/overrides-python-model-marker branch from 85a71df to f3db8c6 Compare October 13, 2026 22:40
@kinyoklion
kinyoklion force-pushed the rlamb/overrides-python-override-store branch from 3cd92be to cbbe302 Compare October 13, 2026 22:40
@kinyoklion

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

bugbot review

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Stale Bugbot comment from a previous run.

@kinyoklion

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

bugbot review

1 similar comment
@kinyoklion

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

bugbot review

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Stale Bugbot comment from a previous run.

@kinyoklion

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

bugbot review

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Stale Bugbot comment from a previous run.

@kinyoklion

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

bugbot review

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Stale Bugbot comment from a previous run.

@kinyoklion
kinyoklion force-pushed the rlamb/overrides-python-model-marker branch from f3db8c6 to d9973c8 Compare November 3, 2026 23:56
@kinyoklion
kinyoklion force-pushed the rlamb/overrides-python-override-store branch 2 times, most recently from 8fdc8b5 to 0656fef Compare November 4, 2026 19:20
@kinyoklion
kinyoklion force-pushed the rlamb/overrides-python-model-marker branch 2 times, most recently from 02a32ab to 6393a98 Compare November 4, 2026 19:49
@kinyoklion
kinyoklion force-pushed the rlamb/overrides-python-override-store branch from 0656fef to b8f3c91 Compare November 4, 2026 19:49
@kinyoklion
kinyoklion force-pushed the rlamb/overrides-python-model-marker branch from 6393a98 to 29b98ac Compare November 4, 2026 22:55
@kinyoklion
kinyoklion force-pushed the rlamb/overrides-python-override-store branch 2 times, most recently from 03595d1 to c571029 Compare November 4, 2026 23:09
@kinyoklion
kinyoklion force-pushed the rlamb/overrides-python-model-marker branch from 29b98ac to 1debdc2 Compare November 4, 2026 23:09
Base automatically changed from rlamb/overrides-python-model-marker to feat/overrides November 6, 2026 17:42
@kinyoklion
kinyoklion marked this pull request as ready for review November 6, 2026 17:43
@kinyoklion
kinyoklion requested a review from a team as a code owner November 6, 2026 17:43
Adds the override layer described by the OVERRIDE specification: an override
store that holds marked flag and segment definitions, an overlay at the store
read boundary that returns the override entry for a key in preference to
LaunchDarkly data and enumerates the union of both, and a sink that applies
each snapshot as a single replacement and notifies flag change listeners of
every flag whose evaluation may have changed, including flags that depend on
a changed prerequisite or segment.

The override source is an option of the FDv2 data system configuration:
DataSystemConfig.override_source and ConfigBuilder.overrides(). The source
is built with the data system, so invalid configuration raises from the
client constructor. It starts before the data system's own threads, so its
initial load completes before the constructor returns, and it is closed with
the client. OverrideSource and OverrideSink are public protocols so a custom
source can be supplied.

The client consults the override store before its not-initialized
short-circuit. An overridden flag is served before the client has
LaunchDarkly data, and a flag absent from the override store still returns
the client-not-ready default. The all-flags state reads through the overlay
and, while the client has no LaunchDarkly data, contains only the overridden
flags. The async client and data system receive the same changes, with
override change notifications delivered on the event loop.

The OVERRIDE specification test vectors run as a unit test through the full
client stack.
…arkly data

Before initialization the clients consult the override layer directly. A flag the layer does not hold gets the not-ready handling it had without an override source, for an invalid context, a store outage, and an uninitialized persistent store alike. The all-flags state is unavailable when the layer is empty. The sync client stops the components it started when the data system fails to start.
… changes

The override layer keeps a dependency graph of its own entries, rebuilt on each
replacement. The store expands every changed LaunchDarkly item through both its
own graph and the layer's, to a fixpoint, so a change to a prerequisite flag or
a segment that an override entry references notifies that entry's flag as well.
This matches how dependent flags behave for LaunchDarkly data.
…iled override source from stopping the client

all_flags_state returns a state of overrides alone only when no
LaunchDarkly data is available and the override layer holds flags, and
it reads those flags from the layer itself. Before, any layer entry was
enough: a layer of segments alone over a store that held LaunchDarkly
data without an init marker produced a valid state of that data, and
with override flags present the same data entered the state. The
overlay no longer serves the layer's entries alone when the base store
fails to list its items, so a client whose store fails reports an
invalid state and logs the failure, as it does without a source.

An exception from the override source's start no longer fails client
construction or start. The data system logs it, closes the source,
clears what the source supplied, and the client runs without overrides.
The SDK's own file-based source does not raise from start; a custom
source could.

Stopping the data system closes the override sink before it closes the
source, so a snapshot supplied during shutdown is ignored.

When the client is offline and an override source is configured, the
SDK logs a warning that the source is not started.
A source logs and retries a failed load, and raises a configuration
error from its builder's build. If start raises anyway, the SDK logs it,
closes the source, removes its snapshot, and the client runs without
overrides.
…nnot list its flags

When the store's all-items read fails, the client logs the failure as
before and, if the override layer holds flags, returns a state of those
flags marked invalid instead of an empty one. Overrides only add to the
state, and a client-side SDK bootstrapped from it uses its flags whatever
$valid says, so the overridden values still reach it. With no override
flags the state is the same invalid, empty state as without a source.
…flag

An evaluation that fails after reading a definition from the override
layer is still marked (OVERRIDE 1.5.4). The single-flag and all-flags
error paths of both clients now set overrideAffected on the EXCEPTION
reason from the flag's own marker, read through is_override_definition
so that the error path cannot fail on an unexpected store item.
@kinyoklion
kinyoklion force-pushed the rlamb/overrides-python-override-store branch from c571029 to 2fc0ad0 Compare November 6, 2026 17:53

@keelerm84 keelerm84 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Two things I'd like to see in the description, so they don't look like oversights later:

  • The async client computes its change fan-out over the in-memory store (async_fdv2.py:340-345). While a persistent store is the active store, a LaunchDarkly flag that depends on an overridden flag is not notified when the override changes. The directly overridden keys still are. The code comment covers this, but users of the async client with a persistent store should hear about it from the docs as well.
  • all_flags_state still keeps trackEvents, trackReason and debugEventsUntilDate for override-affected flags (1.4.1.1). That lands with the events step, so a line saying it's deferred would help anyone reviewing this PR on its own.

Comment thread ldclient/impl/overrides/layer.py Outdated
Comment on lines +48 to +51
replacement: LayerContents = {
FEATURES: {key: FEATURES.decode(item).with_override_marker() for key, item in flags.items()},
SEGMENTS: {key: SEGMENTS.decode(item).with_override_marker() for key, item in segments.items()},
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

set_all accepts a definition with "deleted": true. The overlay's get and the not-initialized path in client.py:508 then serve it, without the deleted filter that the base store applies (store.py:72). FeatureFlag.__init__ returns early for a deleted item, so the slotted fields are never set, and evaluation raises. The except block at client.py:547 (async_client.py:560) then calls new_default_event(flag, ...), which reads flag.track_events and raises AttributeError outside any try. That exception reaches the application from variation() and variation_detail().

The SDK's own file source can produce this: {"flags": {"f": {"deleted": true}}} gets through _definition on the file-source branch. Someone who builds an override file from an exported payload could hit it.

Could set_all drop deleted items? The file data source behaves that way today, because the store filters them, so a deleted entry means "no override for this key". It would also be good to have a test for both clients.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This reply was written by an AI agent (Claude Code) working on behalf of @kinyoklion.

We went with rejecting a deleted entry rather than dropping it, and made that the rule in the spec and in all six SDKs.

  • A deleted item is a tombstone, which exists only for storage in a data store. An override entry defines a flag or segment, and an override is removed by removing its entry.
  • Dropping the entry would silently ignore what the operator wrote. For example, someone who writes "deleted": true during an incident to switch a flag off would see the LaunchDarkly value unchanged, with no error.

The spec change is launchdarkly/sdk-specs#288 (Requirements 1.1.1.1, 1.2.8.1, 1.2.8.2 and 1.3.6.2):

  • A snapshot that contains a flag or segment marked as deleted is rejected whole, and the overrides in effect stay. The SDK logs the rejection, and set_overrides raises ValueError to the source.
  • An override file with such an entry fails the reload, the same way as a file that cannot be parsed, and the log names the file and the key.
  • "deleted": false, as in entries copied from LaunchDarkly data, still loads.

For Python this is #574, stacked on top of this stack. It covers both clients: variation() and variation_detail() no longer raise, with a deleted entry from a custom source or from the file source. The contract tests are in launchdarkly/sdk-test-harness#599, and they pass against #574 with both the sync and async test services.

Comment thread ldclient/impl/overrides/layer.py Outdated
Comment on lines +48 to +51
replacement: LayerContents = {
FEATURES: {key: FEATURES.decode(item).with_override_marker() for key, item in flags.items()},
SEGMENTS: {key: SEGMENTS.decode(item).with_override_marker() for key, item in segments.items()},
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The layer keys each entry by its mapping key, but all_flags_state reports flag['key'] (client.py:636, :656), and events use the definition's key too. If a custom source supplies {'a': <definition with key 'b'>}, variation('a') serves the override with events keyed b. Meanwhile all_flags_state drops LaunchDarkly flag a and shows LaunchDarkly's b in place of the override. The file source can't produce this because it forces the key, but OverrideSource is public, and nothing in the set_overrides docstring rules this case out. A ValueError on a mismatch here, which set_overrides already documents for invalid definitions, would make the error visible to the source instead of corrupting the report.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This reply was written by an AI agent (Claude Code) working on behalf of @kinyoklion.

Fixed in 0489514. OverrideLayer.set_all raises ValueError when a definition's key differs from its key in the mapping, and the layer is left unchanged. The set_overrides docs now say that each definition's key must be its key in the mapping.

Tests:

  • test_overrides.py covers a flag and a segment, as a model object and as a dict.
  • In test_ldclient_overrides.py, a source supplies {'a': <definition with key 'b'>}. The snapshot is rejected, a keeps its previous override, b keeps its LaunchDarkly value, and the all-flags state shows both.

Comment thread ldclient/client.py Outdated
Comment on lines +292 to +299
def _close_components(self):
"""
Stops the SDK components after a failed start-up. The event processor is last because
it may still be sending events the other components generated.
"""
self._data_system.stop()
self.__big_segment_store_manager.stop()
self._event_processor.stop()

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If _data_system.stop() raises here, that exception replaces the one from start. big_segment_store_manager.stop() and _event_processor.stop() are then skipped, so the event processor's threads leak, which this teardown was meant to prevent. Could each stop() go in its own try/except that logs, so every component is stopped and the caller still gets the original start failure?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This reply was written by an AI agent (Claude Code) working on behalf of @kinyoklion.

Fixed in 0489514. _close_components stops the data system, the big segment store manager, and the event processor each in its own try/except. A failure to stop is logged as a warning, so every component is stopped and the constructor raises the original start failure. A new test makes the data system's stop raise, and checks that the other two components still stop and that the start failure reaches the caller.

The async client's _close_components has the same pattern. It came from main (#486) and this PR does not change it, so I've left it for a follow-up.

…nent after a failed start

The override layer rejects a snapshot whose definition has a key other than its key in the mapping, because evaluation reads the mapping key while the all-flags report and events use the definition key. After a failed start, each component is stopped in turn and a failure to stop is logged, so the start-up failure reaches the caller and the event processor still stops. The async override docs say that, with a persistent store, a change to an override does not notify LaunchDarkly flags that depend on it.
@kinyoklion

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

This reply was written by an AI agent (Claude Code) working on behalf of @kinyoklion.

@keelerm84, both points from your review are now in the description:

  • The async client with a persistent store: a change to an override notifies the overridden flags but not the LaunchDarkly flags that depend on them. The docs of AsyncDataSystemConfig.override_source say this too (0489514).
  • trackEvents, trackReason and debugEventsUntilDate: these are still kept for override-affected flags in this PR. feat: Mark override-affected evaluations in analytics events #528 clears them.

@kinyoklion

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

bugbot review

@kinyoklion
kinyoklion requested a review from keelerm84 November 10, 2026 19:18

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ Bugbot reviewed your changes and found no new issues!

Comment @cursor review or bugbot run to trigger another review on this PR

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 0489514. Configure here.

@kinyoklion
kinyoklion merged commit 1ac5575 into feat/overrides Nov 10, 2026
17 checks passed
@kinyoklion
kinyoklion deleted the rlamb/overrides-python-override-store branch November 10, 2026 22:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants