Skip to content

CourseContent model - associates a CourseRun with a LearningPackage [FC-0138] - #937

Draft
bradenmacdonald wants to merge 9 commits into
mainfrom
braden/course-content
Draft

bradenmacdonald wants to merge 9 commits into
mainfrom
braden/course-content

Conversation

@bradenmacdonald

@bradenmacdonald bradenmacdonald commented Nov 13, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR depends on:

This PR implements ADR 12: Course Learning Packages, so that we have a very minimal database table that can associate a course run with a learning package.

As described in that ADR, it does not assume that course runs and learning packages are 1:1.

For now and for the foreseeable future, this new CourseContent model that associates a course run with a learning package is only created on an as-needed basis. It is not proactively created until we actually have to store something for a particular course in a LearningPackage.

bradenmacdonald and others added 9 commits November 5, 2026 19:20
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Implements decision 3 of ADR 0012 (Course Learning Packages): a new
"courses" applet with a CourseContent model that maps each CourseRun to
zero or one LearningPackage. The learning_package foreign key is
deliberately not unique, so several course runs may share a package,
and a test guards against that being constrained away.

The API can create a new LearningPackage for a course run, with a
package_ref that includes the course key plus a random suffix (decision
4), and supports lookups in both directions without relying on
package_ref.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Gets a course run's CourseContent, or atomically creates it along with a
new Learning Package. If another caller creates the CourseContent
concurrently, the new Learning Package is rolled back and the existing
CourseContent is returned. This lets callers such as an idempotent
migration command set up a course run without handling races.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@openedx-webhooks openedx-webhooks added open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U core contributor PR author is a Core Contributor (who may or may not have write access to this repo). labels Nov 13, 2026
@openedx-webhooks

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for the pull request, @bradenmacdonald!

This repository is currently maintained by @axim-engineering.

Once you've gone through the following steps feel free to tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for engineering review.

🔘 Get product approval

If you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.

  • If it does, you'll need to submit a product proposal for your contribution, and have it reviewed by the Product Working Group.
    • This process (including the steps you'll need to take) is documented here.
  • If it doesn't, simply proceed with the next step.
🔘 Provide context

To help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:

  • Dependencies

    This PR must be merged before / after / at the same time as ...

  • Blockers

    This PR is waiting for OEP-1234 to be accepted.

  • Timeline information

    This PR must be merged by XX date because ...

  • Partner information

    This is for a course on edx.org.

  • Supporting documentation
  • Relevant Open edX discussion forum threads
🔘 Get a green build

If one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green.

🔘 Update the status of your PR

Your PR is currently marked as a draft. After completing the steps above, update its status by clicking "Ready for Review", or removing "WIP" from the title, as appropriate.


Where can I find more information?

If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:

When can I expect my changes to be merged?

Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible.

However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:

  • The size and impact of the changes that it introduces
  • The need for product review
  • Maintenance status of the parent repository

💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Draft PR not reviewed

Draft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.

  • Trigger a manual review

To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this to Needs Triage in Contributions Nov 13, 2026
@bradenmacdonald bradenmacdonald changed the title CourseContent model - associates a CourseRun with a LearningPackage CourseContent model - associates a CourseRun with a LearningPackage [FC-0138] Nov 13, 2026
@bradenmacdonald bradenmacdonald added the FC Relates to an Axim Funded Contribution project label Nov 13, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

core contributor PR author is a Core Contributor (who may or may not have write access to this repo). FC Relates to an Axim Funded Contribution project open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U

Projects

Status: Needs Triage

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants