[davidnmbond]

The governance check on main was 91/93: CQ-05 (two methods over Codacy's complexity limit of 8) and CQ-06 (the Jira and GitHub mappers graded B for 9% duplication, and IssueText.cs for the same complexity issue).

• CategoryExecutor.BuildCategoryResult and IssueText.Classify are split into smaller methods.
• The two mappers' duplicated Text helper is now one internal JsonReading.StringAt.

No behaviour change; 833 tests pass.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[codacy-production]

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

🟢 Metrics -5 complexity · -2 duplication

Metric	Results
Complexity	-5
Duplication	-2

View in Codacy

🟢 Coverage 100.00% diff coverage · +0.00% coverage variation

Metric	Results
Coverage variation	✅ +0.00% coverage variation (-1.00%)
Diff coverage	✅ 100.00% diff coverage

View coverage diff in Codacy

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (485a75e)	2004	2003	99.95%
Head commit (9f2b577)	2004 (+0)	2003 (+0)	99.95% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#3)	37	37	100.00%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

AI Reviewer: run a review on demand. To trigger the first review automatically, go to your organization or repository integration settings. AI can make mistakes. Always validate suggestions.

_{TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.}