[davidnmbond]

Adds the MS ticket-readiness checks used by the Jira skill, the QA Dashboard and the Magic Suite release gate. Tracks #5 and Jira MS-27629.

What changes

• NormalizedIssue gains ReleaseNotes (Jira customfield_10600, string or ADF) and Resolution (fields.resolution.name); JSON keys releaseNotes, resolution.
• Built-in rubric, MS only:
  • ReleaseNotes (and EpicReleaseNotes for epics), mandatory cap 0.79: present, not a placeholder, not generic, at least 8 words, differs from the summary, customer-facing (no ticket keys, paths or code identifiers; standards ids such as UTF-8 and CVE ids allowed), no em dash, British spelling.
  • TicketContract (non-epics), mandatory cap 0.79: every acceptance criterion classified MUST/SHOULD/MAY (leading keyword, a single RFC 2119 keyword in the sentence, or a label line above), at least one MUST; from Ready for Test onwards (including Ready for Customer and With Customer) an h2. Verification Evidence section, optionally (Retrospective), with criterion table, Reachability, Not covered and a suggested QA route.
  • Both are not applicable to undelivered resolutions (anything but Fixed or Done).
• All projects: Documentation and Certifications accept a justified No documentation change: <reason> / No certification question: <reason> line.
• New building blocks: fieldsDiffer condition, criteriaClassification measure.

Evidence

• 972 tests pass (901 before the final-review fixes); Release build 0 warnings.
• OPS and PS scores unchanged: 444 side-by-side comparisons of 1.1.x against this branch (score, grade, findings, recommendations) found no differences.
• Criteria classification measured against 400 live MS tickets created since 17 September.

[codacy-production]

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

🟢 Metrics 115 complexity · 0 duplication

Metric	Results
Complexity	115
Duplication	0

View in Codacy

🟢 Coverage 98.18% diff coverage · -0.05% coverage variation

Metric	Results
Coverage variation	✅ -0.05% coverage variation (-1.00%)
Diff coverage	✅ 98.18% diff coverage

View coverage diff in Codacy

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (64e9691)	2005	2004	99.95%
Head commit (7c8aaa3)	2057 (+52)	2055 (+51)	99.90% (-0.05%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#6)	55	54	98.18%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

AI Reviewer: run a review on demand. To trigger the first review automatically, go to your organization or repository integration settings. AI can make mistakes. Always validate suggestions.

_{TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.}