Skip to content

docs: compare 2D, depth-driven 2.5D and full 3D capabilities - #95

Merged
firejune merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
naru/90-capability-matrix
Oct 27, 2026
Merged

firejune merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
naru/90-capability-matrix

Conversation

@firejune

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closes #90.

New /docs/capabilities/: a compact matrix by route (cut-out 2D, 2D retarget with depth cues, Core depth-driven rotation, the released Parts depth-sheet head turn, the standalone preview bundle) with required input, producing package/version, controls, output and the playback record — VERIFIED (pinned record) / UNVERIFIED / UNSUPPORTED (full 3D reconstruction, relighting). Linked from the docs hub and the head-turn example; licensing linked, not restated.

Corrected: "layer parallax" does not describe Core's projection (cosine narrowing + sine depth, bone foreshortening); Parts 1.68.0 sets narrowing:false deliberately; the preview bundle has its own controller; the Three host does not relight.

Check Result
targeted / full 25 pass / 68 pass (642 assertions)
build / verify 13 pages + 8 redirects / 0 (13 HTML + 13 Markdown, path + anchor checks)
planted-anchor control red → green
browser, 1440×1000 and 390×844 no overflow; hub and head-turn links work

Rejected: format-name equivalence; latest-for-historical pins; verified-integration claims; orbit/lighting/legal promises; the #89 chooser.

@codex review

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

A visitor deciding whether rig-c fits a project had to read every package
page to learn what a "turn" is. /docs/capabilities/ is a compact matrix by
route — cut-out 2D, 2D retarget with depth cues, Core depth-driven rotation,
the released Parts depth-sheet head turn, the standalone preview bundle — with
required input, producing package and version, controls, output and the
playback record that verifies it, marked VERIFIED (an existing pinned record),
UNVERIFIED (no playback evidence here) or UNSUPPORTED (full 3D
reconstruction and toon relighting). Each statement is pinned to the
published source it describes.

Corrected while writing it: a blanket "layer parallax" description does not
fit Core's rotation projection (cosine narrowing plus sine depth, bone
foreshortening); Parts 1.68.0 sets narrowing:false on purpose; the standalone
preview has its own scene and controller; the Three.js host places a flat
group in a scene and does not relight it.

Measured: targeted 25 pass (the Core ordinal fixture moved by the new page was
repaired to a stable section id, the initial red kept); full suite 68 pass /
642 assertions; build 13 pages + 8 redirects; verify 0 over 13 HTML + 13
Markdown with path and anchor checks; the planted-anchor control still red
then green; desktop 1440×1000 and narrow 390×844 without document overflow,
hub and head-turn links working at both sizes.

Rejected: format-name → playback equivalence; replacing historical pins with
latest; claiming the depth producer's runtime integration verified; any
lighting, orbit or legal promise; the #89 chooser and any demo edit.

Closes #90

Co-Authored-By: Naru <342599188+fj-naru[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Roa <342598975+fj-roa[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 27, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-27T03:33:34.280611Z 585cf90 Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. More of your lovely PRs please.

Reviewed commit: 585cf901e2

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@firejune
firejune merged commit c58b914 into main Oct 27, 2026
3 checks passed
@firejune
firejune deleted the naru/90-capability-matrix branch October 27, 2026 03:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

docs(capabilities): distinguish 2D, depth-driven 2.5D and full 3D with a support matrix

1 participant