Repository navigation
Clean up repository documentation and notebook navigation - #8
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The README repeated Jupyter setup and mixed three notebook workflows, making the starting point and source of truth difficult to find. Historical migration notes also presented old verification details without a clear archive label.
This cleanup:
Build scripts, image recipes, executable notebooks and CI configuration are unchanged.
Validation:
make checkpassed all 47 tests plus source and shell checks; existing tests checked local documentation links.git diff --checkpassed. The test suite emits existing subprocess ResourceWarnings. OS image construction, VM boot and live FreeIPA enrollment were not run for this documentation-only change.