[we4sz]

Six fields that Slack documents on its user object have no property in SlackNet 0.19.0. I ran into the first one building an app on SlackNet that matches Slack users to accounts in its own system by their profile email: an address Slack hasn't confirmed is whatever a workspace administrator typed, so I read is_email_confirmed from the raw users.info response next to the typed User. I found the other five by comparing a real users.info response and the reference with User and UserProfile. This models them. It is four commits, each one builds and passes the tests.

1. User.IsEmailConfirmed (is_email_confirmed): "Whether the user's email address has been confirmed." It is what tells an app that Profile.Email is Slack's word and not an administrator's.
2. User.WhoCanShareContactCard (who_can_share_contact_card): "Contact card sharing permission setting." A string, because the reference doesn't list the values; its example shows EVERYONE.
3. User.IsWorkflowBot (is_workflow_bot): "Whether this is a workflow bot user.", next to IsBot.
4. UserProfile.DisplayNameNormalized (display_name_normalized), Image1024 (image_1024) and IsCustomImage (is_custom_image), next to RealNameNormalized and the other image sizes. Image1024 needs [JsonProperty("image_1024")] like Image24 to Image512 have.

The doc comments copy Slack's one-line descriptions, as AGENTS.md asks.

Compatibility

Additive only. The new properties default to null or false.

Testing

Each field has a deserialization test in UserTests, in the same shape as the existing ones. ./do test passes on all four commits (784, 785, 786 and 788 tests). I also took the [JsonProperty("image_1024")] off Image1024 to check that its test needs it, and it fails without it.

Seen in a real response: is_email_confirmed, who_can_share_contact_card, display_name_normalized, image_1024 and is_custom_image are all in a users.info response I captured from a real workspace.

Not verified: is_workflow_bot. I haven't seen it in a real response, so it follows the reference only. I also haven't run my app against a local pack of this branch.