Skip to content

chore(deps): bump sqlquack to 19c51fa2 - #1368

Closed
kvlonge wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
chore/sqlquack-rev-bump
Closed

kvlonge wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
chore/sqlquack-rev-bump

Conversation

@kvlonge

@kvlonge kvlonge commented Nov 8, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Why

The native analysis route and the dialect arms need the SQLQuack parsers now on SQLQuack main. Moving the pin in its own PR keeps one place to look if a hash moves.

Do not merge yet. SQLQuack main past 3115fa31 makes the 3,000-model compile-cache job fail until the relation-marker placeholder helper lands in SQLBuild. This PR will be rebased onto that helper's PR and leaves draft once that job passes.

Changes

  • Bumps sqlquack-syntax and sqlquack-syntax-postgres from 4d0c6bc5 to SQLQuack main 19c51fa2.
  • sqlquack-syntax-postgres gains a stacker dependency. Cargo re-resolves six Windows-only windows-sys dependency edges as a result. Linux and macOS builds are unaffected.
  • feat(scenario): map scenario column types with SQLQuack's type parsers #1364 also bumps the SQLQuack pin. Whichever merges second rebases onto the other and keeps every SQLQuack crate at the same SQLQuack main commit.

Verification

No user-visible change:

Check Result
make compiler-differential (--goldens check) 391 projects as expected; tests/goldens unchanged
cargo test -p sqlbuild-analysis, including the query fingerprint token tests 302 passed
pytest tests/unit/src/sqlbuild/compiler/fingerprints 59 passed

sqlquack main 19c51fa2 carries the Postgres parser work and the train that
followed a9dde6a0. sqlquack-syntax-postgres now depends on stacker, which
re-resolves a few Windows-only windows-sys edges in the lock.

kvlonge commented Nov 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Closing: every commit on this branch is already contained in #1374 (the combined parser train), which will land this change. The branch is kept; reopen if #1374 is dropped.

@kvlonge kvlonge closed this Nov 8, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant