Repository navigation
docs: say the formatter runs on SQLQuack, not Polyglot - #51
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This was referenced Nov 9, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why
Two module doc comments still said the formatter reads Polyglot. SQLClean has formatted every dialect it formats with SQLQuack since #38 and #42, and no Polyglot crate is left in the dependency tree (
cargo tree -i polyglot-sqlmatches no package).Changes
crates/sqlclean/src/lib.rsandcrates/sqlclean/src/sql_lint/mod.rs: the module doc comments say the engine and the formatter run on SQLQuack.Verification
cargo fmt --all --checkpasses, and no code changes.