[kvlonge]

Why

Polyglot describes itself as "a Rust SQL transpiler inspired by SQLGlot". The README, the credits page and the syntax notes called it a Rust port of SQLGlot and said SQLQuack's parser follows SQLGlot's design, which isn't accurate.

Changes

• README: the intro sentence now uses Polyglot's own description, and the SQLGlot credit reads "for years of work on SQL transpilation that this space builds on".
• Credits page: the same SQLGlot credit, keeping the note that SQLQuack uses the Snowflake SQL of SQLGlot's test suite as case inputs, with answers recorded from Snowflake.
• docs/syntax-notes.md: removes three "ported from" or "based on" sqlglot remarks. The rustdoc comments they were kept from no longer carry them.

THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES already says "inspired by sqlglot" and keeps sqlglot's licence text, so it is unchanged. No code, dependency or Cargo change.

Verification

• The website builds locally, and the built credits page shows the new text with no "port".
• rg finds no remaining port or based-on claim about SQLGlot in the README, docs, website sources or crates.