Skip to content

docs: update notes for GNU coreutils PPA in CONTRIBUTING.md - #15542

Open
xtqqczze wants to merge 1 commit into
uutils:mainfrom
xtqqczze:docs-contributing-ppa
Open

xtqqczze wants to merge 1 commit into
uutils:mainfrom
xtqqczze:docs-contributing-ppa

Conversation

@xtqqczze

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

cc: @BAMF0

Comment thread CONTRIBUTING.md

- The package is PATCHED, so it may differ from upstream.
- NEVER install this package on your system — it isn't meant for daily use.
Instead, manually download and extract the [tarball](https://launchpad.net/~bamf0/+archive/ubuntu/coreutils-reference/+files/gnu-coreutils_9.12-0ubuntu1~ppa1_amd64.deb)

@oech3 oech3 Oct 20, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think direct URL for tarball is still needed because people might accidentally install using apt-get on the system.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I’m not sure there’s a URL that would reliably point to the latest version of the package.

@oech3 oech3 Oct 20, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@xtqqczze
xtqqczze marked this pull request as ready for review October 21, 2026 10:46
Comment thread CONTRIBUTING.md
Instead, manually download and extract the [tarball](https://launchpad.net/~bamf0/+archive/ubuntu/coreutils-reference/+files/gnu-coreutils_9.12-0ubuntu1~ppa1_amd64.deb)
and run it from there.
- Bug reports and fixes for this package itself are not accepted here.
Our goal is to achieve compatibility with GNU coreutils, targeting the latest

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the previous wording was shorter and clearer, why change it?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the new wording is clearer and more accurate about our compatibility goals with GNU coreutils. Is there specific wording you'd prefer?

Comment thread CONTRIBUTING.md
stable release and accounting for relevant behavioral changes in its
development branch.

The version of GNU coreutils available in a distribution’s repositories may

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please use a plain ' instead of ’

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done on local branch

Comment thread CONTRIBUTING.md

- **PATCHED:** This package contains patches and may differ from the
corresponding upstream GNU coreutils release.
- **NO SUPPORT:** The PPA is provided as-is, with no guarantees of stability or future updates.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please keep the "Bug reports and fixes for this package itself are not accepted here" line, it was dropped

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note that bug report is not accepted by packager too.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please keep the "Bug reports and fixes for this package itself are not accepted here" line, it was dropped

I think this goes without saying, and avoids the implication that bug reports for the PPA are accepted upstream.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants