Repository navigation
Remove redundant microbenchmarks - #11179
Performance Regression: -4.24%
1 warning
⚠️ Walltime results may be unreliableSome benchmarks used the Walltime instrument outside CodSpeed Macro Runners, which can make the results inconsistent.
⚡ 3 improved benchmarks
❌ 5 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1740 untouched benchmarks
🆕 17 new benchmarks
⏩ 611 skipped benchmarks1
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | CPU Simulation | bitwise_and_vortex_buffer[128] |
4.1 µs | 5.8 µs | -29.56% |
| ❌ | CPU Simulation | patched_take_10_stratified |
55.1 µs | 69.4 µs | -20.68% |
| ❌ | CPU Simulation | random_i64[0.95] |
129.1 µs | 155.5 µs | -16.99% |
| ❌ | CPU Simulation | primitive_i64_vortex |
72.3 µs | 86.1 µs | -16.01% |
| ❌ | CPU Simulation | fragmented_runs[7] |
111.1 µs | 126.5 µs | -12.15% |
| ⚡ | CPU Simulation | patterns_i128[Runs] |
99.2 µs | 74.3 µs | +33.59% |
| ⚡ | CPU Simulation | random_i128[0.5] |
123.1 µs | 95.4 µs | +29.1% |
| ⚡ | CPU Simulation | random_i128[0.8] |
149.1 µs | 124.5 µs | +19.82% |
| 🆕 | CPU Simulation | add_canonical |
N/A | 929.3 µs | N/A |
| 🆕 | CPU Simulation | add_constant |
N/A | 533.8 µs | N/A |
| 🆕 | CPU Simulation | add_widen |
N/A | 598.8 µs | N/A |
| 🆕 | CPU Simulation | between_in_range |
N/A | 136.4 µs | N/A |
| 🆕 | CPU Simulation | cast_f64 |
N/A | 349.6 µs | N/A |
| 🆕 | CPU Simulation | chunked |
N/A | 1.5 ms | N/A |
| 🆕 | CPU Simulation | compare_in_range |
N/A | 161.5 µs | N/A |
| 🆕 | CPU Simulation | decode |
N/A | 342.8 µs | N/A |
| 🆕 | CPU Simulation | fill_null_out_of_range |
N/A | 1.2 ms | N/A |
| 🆕 | CPU Simulation | filter |
N/A | 325 µs | N/A |
| 🆕 | CPU Simulation | interleave |
N/A | 1.3 ms | N/A |
| 🆕 | CPU Simulation | min_max |
N/A | 130.3 µs | N/A |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing ct/stoic-rubin-t4f27x (3cd9a97) with develop (24cd0ea)
Footnotes
-
611 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩