[filipsajdak]

The Qt series flagship for 29 October: how much of moc reflection replaces, as the conformance matrix of reflect-moc stood on 24 October (merge b253416), and what a class with no macro looks like.

slot	before	after
29 Oct, second post (16:00Z)	reflection-dangling-signature	moc-parity-matrix-reflection
2 Nov, second post (16:00Z)	none	reflection-dangling-signature (a planned double in schedule_doubles.py)

• Claims are limited to the matrix: 47 rows, 29 same (24 checked against a real moc's output, 5 tested without a twin), 5 partial, 11 unsupported, 1 impossible, 1 not needed. The row counts and test names were checked against docs/moc-parity.md and tests/qt/parity at that commit. The sizes (16, 24, 16 bytes; 32 against 40 with two signals) and the failing QMetaEnum::fromType on a macro-free class were measured in small files; the post says the second one has no test yet.
• Not covered by the post, and said so: GCC 16.2 and Qt 6.10.3 only, lupdate untried, AI-written tests reviewed by verdict.
• Gates on the final tree: prose-lint --strict (post and four captions), readability-report, check-pubdates, check-social-render for both slugs, npm run test:prose, npm run check:future.
• Buffer is untouched. The auto-scheduler queues both posts when slots free; the 2 Nov entry for the lint post is created then.

Visual: none, because the change is text and a schedule, with the before/after in the table.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01BTCmkp4nQKAhWT8TGXF9KX