Skip to content

test(g01): distinguish broker header capture boundaries - #168

Merged
jjangg96 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/issue-1-public-ci-header-boundary-fix-2026-11-13
Nov 13, 2026
Merged

jjangg96 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/issue-1-public-ci-header-boundary-fix-2026-11-13

Conversation

@jjangg96

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Follow-up for #1, addressing the G01 core failure in post-merge Public CI run 43403108575 on 227d6f5.

The G02 client leaves Accept-Encoding unset. A direct synthetic RoundTripper observes an empty value; the actual child command crosses Go's net/http transport, so its HTTPS test server observes the transport-added gzip value. The shared fixture assertion now receives the expected value for each capture boundary.

Verification

  • RED reproduced locally on the pre-fix group-policy subcase.
  • PASS: TestExperimentalActualCommandBrokerReceiver with race detection and current-source helpers.
  • PASS: TestControllerProcessHandoffV3ActualBrokerChild with race detection.
  • PASS: go vet -p=1 -tags=g01_pair_fixture ./livecanary.
  • PASS: git diff --check.
  • Independent Luna Max contract review: APPROVE, no findings.

Test/evidence-only change; no production behavior or live canary operation. Issue #1 remains open pending the existing live acceptance gates.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Nov 13, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Codex Review Summary: ✅ Completed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-13T10:07:41.712398Z 8c14819 Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@jjangg96

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Hooray!

Reviewed commit: 8c14819182

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@jjangg96
jjangg96 merged commit 3bfc366 into main Nov 13, 2026
1 check passed
@jjangg96
jjangg96 deleted the codex/issue-1-public-ci-header-boundary-fix-2026-11-13 branch November 13, 2026 10:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant