Skip to content

refactor(app): remove legacy advanced layouts - #41

Open
Foxpace wants to merge 1 commit into
codex/sensorbox-refactor-27-phone-recording-layoutsfrom
codex/sensorbox-refactor-28-phone-advanced-layouts
Open

refactor(app): remove legacy advanced layouts#41
Foxpace wants to merge 1 commit into
codex/sensorbox-refactor-27-phone-recording-layoutsfrom
codex/sensorbox-refactor-28-phone-advanced-layouts

Conversation

@Foxpace

@Foxpace Foxpace commented Aug 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Removes XML layouts for advanced measurement configuration.

What was added

  • Removal of annotation, counter, extra-option, and measurement-picker layouts.
  • Removal of reusable single and double picker templates.

How it works

The Compose recording flow creates pickers and option controls from the current measurement state. Selections emit typed intents and are validated by the domain layer, replacing template inflation and fragment-owned widget synchronization.

Stack position

Layer 28 of 31 in the SensorBox refactor stack. Review this PR against its configured base to see only this layer.

Validation

  • Full stack: ./gradlew test — BUILD SUCCESSFUL (160 tasks)

@Foxpace Foxpace changed the title codex/sensorbox refactor 28 phone advanced layouts refactor(app): remove legacy advanced layouts Aug 15, 2026
@Foxpace
Foxpace marked this pull request as ready for review August 15, 2026 21:51

Foxpace commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Superseded by #46, which targets master and shows the final current tree. Closing this stacked layer so review stays on the consolidated diff; this PR remains available as history.

@Foxpace Foxpace closed this Aug 19, 2026

Foxpace commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Stack restored at the author's request. This PR is again part of the original 31-layer refactor chain. The architecture work continues as stacked PRs #47 through #54; consolidated PR #46 is superseded.

@Foxpace Foxpace reopened this Aug 19, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant