Repository navigation
Pin client to the rebased and merged reader commit - #95
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has insufficient remaining quota.
An organization owner can choose the repository organization as the billing source for reviews requested by members with a paid Copilot license. Learn about Copilot code review billing.
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
Updates
app/pubspec.yamlandapp/pubspec.lockto9aaf5f2d9b0f7194ac2c6c8d84c6217f15ca8913, the merged development commit from reader#8, replacing the pre-rebase feature-branch revision. Follow-up to #94 and #93 (FR-3_4, FR-4_1, FR-4_2).Verified the commit is on reader development and has the same contents as the reviewed reader head. Dependency resolution, analysis, and all 16 focused reader integration/navigation/persistence tests pass in an isolated checkout using the Git dependency. Local path overrides are excluded.