Repository navigation
Everything for the owner's morning read: copy edits, short security block, six new pages - #53
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…ectory (real run)
…dor wording, title scope
Deploying www with
|
| Latest commit: |
4f45321
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://ebea302e.www-4rw.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://www-owner-copy-edit.www-4rw.pages.dev |
Contributor
Author
|
Added: (1) cut 'six-figure contracts' from /regulated/ (a price claim about other vendors, even unnamed); the sentence now reads 'Big vendors have compliance teams to get through that pile. Small teams mostly just lose the deal.' (2) Re-verified CMVP certificate #5247 against the official listing, https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/cryptographic-module-validation-program/certificate/5247 : 'Go Cryptographic Module', FIPS 140-3, status Active (initial validation 4/27/2026, updated 7/7/2026). The number stays on the pages that quote it. |
…ngs; nine real runs on 0.2.1)
…rong folder; real run on 0.2.1)
… builds on 0.2.1)
…utton border, keyboard-focusable scrolling code and tables, focus outline
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
One PR for everything unheld. Merge this one; nothing else is waiting on you except the held drafts (#32, #33, #41), which stay draft on purpose.
Copy edits (your exact words)
"Security patches are never withheld from the free tier." now remains only on the home page ("Built to be verified, not trusted").
Six new tested pages (folded in from #52, closed)
Each was written from a real run on v0.2.1; none is linked from the home page yet (sitemap only):
Plumbing
Merged main (sitemap fix #54) and regenerated sitemap.xml: 40 entries, one loc each, XML-validated.
Overnight page (real run, new; needs your cold-read)
Accessibility and performance pass (no new reading; every page, 48 files)
Audited all 48 pages with a script and a headless browser. Fixed: (1) button text was white on the dark-mode green (contrast 2.33, needs 4.5): it now follows the theme (8.2); (2) the secondary button border was 1.48 against the page in light mode: now the muted text colour (6.0); (3) 130 code blocks and 22 tables scroll sideways but could not be reached by keyboard: code blocks are focusable, and tables now sit in a focusable scroll box instead of display:block, which can remove table meaning for screen readers; (4) added a visible focus outline. Checked and fine, no change: text contrast on every colour pair (light and dark, all above 4.5), language, viewport, one h1 per page, heading order, link text, no images (so no alt text or image-size issues), no page overflows at 390 px, page weight (48 pages, 521 KB total, largest 20 KB, no images or scripts).
Independent review of this PR's content (www#53, ledger row done)
The independent review (routine tier) ran on 5bf0a5e. Result: no content, CSP, markup, link, metadata, sitemap or 404 findings. Twelve findings said "GitHub" is named as internal tooling; I rejected them: GitHub is where the code, registry and attestations live and customers need the name to verify a release (11 pages already use it, in the owner-approved wording). One finding was real and is fixed (a garbled sentence in README.md). One is for the owner/advisor, unchanged: CONTRIBUTING.md says "the implementation here is done by AI agents under automated gates" (mirrors the cache repo's CONTRIBUTING; it names no vendor or model).
NIST/SLSA page and home card (new, both need your cold-read)