[xtqqczze]

Fix the build with Cargo’s direct-minimal-versions feature.

cargo minimal-versions check --quiet --workspace --all-targets --all-features --direct --workspace-behavior=cargo --target aarch64-apple-darwin

Closes #14929

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/date/resolution (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skip an intermittent issue tests/pr/bounded-memory (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skip an intermittent issue tests/tty/tty-eof (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/date/date-locale-hour (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

GNU test failed: tests/tail/retry. tests/tail/retry is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/date/date-locale-hour (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

GNU test failed: tests/head/head-write-error. tests/head/head-write-error is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/date/date-locale-hour (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skip an intermittent issue tests/tty/tty-eof (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/pr/bounded-memory (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Note: The gnu test tests/dd/no-allocate is now being skipped but was previously passing.

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/date/date-locale-hour (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skip an intermittent issue tests/tty/tty-eof (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/tail/tail-n0f (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/date/date-locale-hour (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skip an intermittent issue tests/tty/tty-eof (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/tail/tail-n0f (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/date/date-locale-hour (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Congrats! The gnu test tests/df/df-output is no longer failing!

[codspeed]

Merging this PR will improve performance by 4.72%

⚠️ 121 benchmarks spent significant time in system calls

System calls cannot be consistently instrumented, so they are not included in the measure, which understates the real cost. Please switch to the Walltime instrument to accurately measure system calls.

Measurement and system calls

• du_deep_tree[(100, 3)]
• sort_very_long_lines_utf8_locale
• cksum_crc
• cksum_default
• cksum_raw_output
• factor_multiple_u64s[2]
• dd_copy_partial
• du_wide_tree[(5000, 500)]
• df_deep_directory
• rm_recursive_tree
• …and 111 more

ℹ️ 1 benchmark has no flamegraph

The flamegraph could not be generated because too much time was spent in runtime internals, making the visualization not useful for performance analysis.

• sort_dictionary_order[500000]

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 1 improved benchmark
✅ 400 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 70 skipped benchmarks¹

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
⚡ ⚠️	CPU Simulation	du_deep_tree[(100, 3)]	1.9 ms	1.9 ms	+4.72%

Tip

Curious why performance improved? Comment @codspeedbot explain why performance improved on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing xtqqczze:minver (2c52b83) with main (ae34722)²}

Footnotes

1. 70 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

2. No successful run was found on main (198c615) during the generation of this report, so ae34722 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

[github-actions]

Binary size comparison:

Individual binary size comparison VS main (threshold: >=5% AND >=4 KB).

Total size of compared binaries: 152.18 MB (+1004 KB, +0.65%)

Significant per-binary changes:
  comm     1.12 MB ->    2.33 MB  (+1.21 MB, +107.29%)

[xtqqczze]

I don't think this is right place for this step